Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth

Case docket

Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC — N.D. Cal.

Oto Benworth — 105 court filings in the archive from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, filed between April 14, 2021 and January 2, 2025. Among them: 46 exhibits, 14 proposed orders and 8 declarations.

See also: Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC — the same docket (docket No. 3:24-cv-03975) under another case page, 111 public filings; 4 of the documents appear on both pages.

Case facts

CaptionOto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC
CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Docket number3:24-cv-03975
Filings105 public filings
Filed2021-04-14 – 2025-01-02
Document typesexhibits (46), proposed orders (14), declarations (8), notices (5), motions (5), orders (4)
Original PDFs105 of 105
ProfilesBenworth Capital Partners, Stuart R. Lombardi, Womply

Case summary

Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, No. 3:24-cv-03975 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is a petition filed July 1, 2024 to confirm a JAMS arbitration award and enter judgment. The exhibits include the corrected final award of June 26, 2024, in which the arbitrator granted the claimant's three breach of contract claims over unpaid referral, API and technology fees under Paycheck Protection Program referral and developer agreements with the lender Benworth, and awarded $4,348,275 in referral fees, $17,067,000 in API fees, $64,884,617 in technology fees, $25,363,697.68 in finance charges, $5,883,708.58 in attorneys' fees and $372,956.46 in costs. The court consolidated the petition with Benworth's petition to vacate, and the parties dismissed all claims with prejudice on January 2, 2025.

Case at a glance

PartiesPetitioner Oto Analytics, LLC, named in the arbitration as Oto Analytics doing business as Womply; respondent Benworth Capital Partners LLC
Court and docketU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO; JAMS arbitration reference No. 1210038203
ProgramPaycheck Protection Program (PPP)
ClaimsPetition to confirm the corrected final arbitration award and for entry of judgment. The underlying arbitration claims were breach of contract for failure to pay referral fees, API fees and technology fees
Disposition or statusDismissed with prejudice by joint stipulation filed January 2, 2025 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear its own fees, costs and expenses. No order confirming or vacating the award is on this page
Status checked2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read

What did the arbitrator award?

Damages of $4,348,275 in referral fees, $17,067,000 in API fees and $64,884,617 in technology fees, plus finance charges of $25,363,697.68 calculated at 10% per annum simple interest as of May 30, 2024, $5,883,708.58 in attorneys' fees and $372,956.46 in costs. All but one of Benworth's counterclaims were denied; on the one granted, the claimant was ordered to transmit copies of borrowers' loan files or to reinstate Benworth's access to its technology platform.

What were the fees in dispute?

Fees payable under an amended and restated PPP loan referral agreement and a developer order form incorporating a master developer agreement: a referral fee expressed as a percentage of the outstanding balance of each referred loan at disbursement, an API fee of $250 for each of the 304,897 PPP loans Benworth funded, and tiered technology fees.

How were the two petitions handled?

A joint stipulation filed November 5, 2024 recites that Oto Analytics petitioned to confirm the award on July 1, 2024, that Benworth petitioned to vacate it on August 7, 2024 in No. 3:24-cv-04840, and that the court consolidated the actions and treated the briefing as cross-petitions.

Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.

Filings

105 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.

  1. Amended PPP Loan Referral Agreement (Exhibit 1) - OTO…PDFWomply and Benworth Capital Partners' amended PPP loan referral agreement setting a 1.00% referral fee, Exhibit 1, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO, April 2021.
  2. Womply Developer Order Form (Exhibit 2) - OTO Analytics, LLC…PDFExhibit 2 in Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.): Womply order form setting API and technology fees for Benworth PPP loans.
  3. Corrected Final Arbitration Award (Exhibit 3) - OTO Analytics…JAMS Corrected Final Award for Womply against Benworth over unpaid PPP fees, Exhibit 3 in No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO, dated June 26, 2024.
  4. Exhibit 9Exhibit · Dkt. 1.10 · PDF
  5. Exhibit 10Exhibit · Dkt. 1.11 · PDF
  6. Exhibit 4Exhibit · Dkt. 1.5 · PDFExhibit 4, JAMS notice appointing an arbitrator, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 1-5.
  7. Civil Cover Sheet by Oto Analytics, LLC . (Cheney, Alexander)…PDFCivil cover sheet, 07/01/24, N.D. Cal.: Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners seeks confirmation of a JAMS arbitral award.
  8. Proposed Summons. (Cheney, Alexander) (Filed on 7/1/2024)Summons or warrant · PDFProposed AO 440 summons, Doc. 3, in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), filed July 1, 2024.
  9. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 4.1 · PDFProposed order granting motion to seal, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 1, 2024.
  10. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 5.1 · PDFProposed order provisionally sealing filings, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 5-1, 07/01/24.
  11. NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander L. Cheney on behalf of…Notice · PDFNotice of Appearance of Alexander L. Cheney for Oto Analytics, LLC d/b/a Womply, No. 3:24-cv-03975 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 10, July 2, 2024.
  12. MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice filed by Oto Analytics, LLC. (Levy, Joshua) (Filed…Motion · Dkt. 11 · PDFPro hac vice application of Joshua S. Levy for Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 2, 2024.
  13. Exhibit 1 - NY Certificate of Good StandingExhibit · Dkt. 11.1 · PDFDoc. 11-1, a New York certificate of good standing for attorney Joshua Seth Levy, filed in No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.) on July 2, 2024.
  14. Exhibit 2 - DC Certificate of Good StandingExhibit · PDF
  15. Summons Issued as to Benworth Capital Partners LLC. (sec, Court Staff) (Filed on 7/2/2024) — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 9)Summons or warrant · PDFAO 440 Summons in a Civil Action to Benworth Capital Partners LLC, Doc. 9, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), 07/02/24.
  16. Motion for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice — Oto AnalyticsMotion · PDFPro hac vice application (July 2024) for a lawyer representing Oto Analytics in its suit against Benworth Capital Partners.
  17. Exhibit 1 - NY Certificate of Good StandingExhibit · Dkt. 12.1 · PDFDoc. 12-1, a New York certificate of good standing for attorney Stuart Roth Lombardi, filed in No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.) on July 3, 2024.
  18. Exhibit 2 - NJ Certificate of Good StandingExhibit · PDFExhibit 2, New Jersey Certificate of Good Standing, July 3, 2024, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 12-2.
  19. Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Oto Analytics — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 15, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Waiver · PDFBenworth Capital Partners waives formal service of summons in Oto Analytics' Northern District of California case.
  20. Proposed Order re 1 Petition,, (Proposed Judgment Upon Petition…Proposed order · PDFProposed judgment confirming June 26, 2024 JAMS award, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 12, 2024.
  21. Certificate/Proof of ServiceDkt. 17.1 · PDFCertificate of Service, Doc. 17-1, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), 07/12/24: petition papers served.
  22. Notice of Eligibility for Video RecordingNotice · PDFClerk's notice (July 2024) that this Northern District of California case is eligible for the courtroom video recording pilot.
  23. NOTICE of Appearance by Simon Seiver Grille (Grille, Simon)…Notice · PDFNotice of Appearance of Simon S. Grille for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 23, July 18, 2024.
  24. Stipulation with Proposed Order (Joint) Re Deadline to Respond — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 24, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Stipulation · PDFWomply and Benworth stipulate on Benworth's deadline to respond to the petition to confirm the arbitration award.
  25. Declaration of Simon Grille In Support of Joint Stipulation — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 24-1, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Declaration · PDFGrille declaration on deadline to respond to Womply's petition, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 18, 2024.
  26. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Clarification of Deadline and/or for…PDFBenworth Capital Partners' July 22, 2024 motion seeking more time to answer Womply's petition to confirm their arbitration award.
  27. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 26.1 · PDFProposed order, Doc. 26-1, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 22, 2024: Benworth's response to Womply's petition due September 3, 2024.
  28. Declaration of Dwayne A. Robinson in Support of 26 Administrative Motion — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 27)Declaration · PDFBenworth's July 2024 declaration seeking more time to answer Womply's petition to confirm their arbitration award.
  29. Exhibit 1Exhibit · Dkt. 27.1 · PDFExhibit 1, Doc. 27-1, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 22, 2024: waiver of service of summons.
  30. Motion for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice — Oto AnalyticsMotion · PDFMichael R. Lorigas applies to appear pro hac vice for Benworth Capital Partners in the Oto Analytics case.
  31. Certificate of Good StandingDkt. 29.1 · PDF
  32. Motion for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Jorge L. — OtoMotion · PDFPro hac vice application of Jorge L. Piedra for Benworth, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), filed July 26, 2024.
  33. Certificate of Good StandingDkt. 30.1 · PDF
  34. Motion for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Dwayne — OtoMotion · PDFApplication of July 25, 2024 to admit Florida attorney Dwayne A. Robinson pro hac vice for Benworth Capital Partners in its case with Oto Analytics.
  35. Certificate of Good StandingDkt. 31.1 · PDF
  36. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 29 Motion for Pro Hac Vice — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 32)Order · PDFCourt order (July 2024) admitting a Florida lawyer pro hac vice for Benworth Capital Partners in its dispute with Oto Analytics.
  37. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 30 Motion for Pro Hac Vice — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 33)Order · PDFCourt grants Jorge L. Piedra pro hac vice admission to represent Benworth Capital Partners in the Oto Analytics case.
  38. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 31 Motion for Pro Hac Vice — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 34)Order · PDFOrder granting pro hac vice admission of Dwayne A. Robinson for Benworth, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 26, 2024.
  39. Declaration of Joshua S. LevyDeclaration · Dkt. 35.1 · PDFWomply counsel Joshua S. Levy's July 26, 2024 declaration on service of its arbitration-award petition on Benworth Capital Partners.
  40. Exhibit - 1Exhibit · Dkt. 35.2 · PDFExhibit 1, Doc. 35-2, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 26, 2024: emails on service of petitions.
  41. Exhibit - 2Exhibit · Dkt. 35.3 · PDFExhibit (July 2024): emails between Womply's and Benworth's lawyers agreeing to accept service of competing arbitration petitions.
  42. Exhibit - 3Exhibit · Dkt. 35.4 · PDFEmail thread between Benworth and Womply counsel over the deadline to respond to the arbitration award petition.
  43. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 35.5 · PDFProposed order denying Benworth's motion for clarification or extension, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 35-5, 07/26/24.
  44. NOTICE by Oto Analytics, LLC re 1 Petition,, Setting Hearing…Notice · PDFNotice of August 8, 2024 hearing on petition to confirm Womply JAMS award, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), July 12, 2024.
  45. NOTICE by Oto Analytics, LLC of Hearing on Petition to Confirm…Notice · PDFWomply's August 12, 2024 notice setting a January 9, 2025 hearing on its petition to confirm the arbitration award against Benworth.
  46. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 38.2 · PDFProposed order granting Benworth's motion to relate cases, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 38-2.
  47. Exhibit 1 — Amended and Restated PPP Loan Referral Agreement - OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Exhibit · PDFExhibit (August 2024): Womply's April 2021 amended PPP loan referral agreement with lender Benworth Capital Partners.
  48. Exhibit 11 — JAMS NAC Decision Denying Challenge to Arbitrator - OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Exhibit · PDF
  49. Exhibit 13 — Arbitration Order No. 7 on Benworth's Motion to Stay - OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Exhibit · PDFJAMS arbitration Order No. 7 denying Benworth's motion to stay the Womply arbitration pending an SBA investigation.
  50. Exhibit 14 — OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLCExhibit · PDFExhibit 14 (Doc. 41-16), Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.): JAMS Order No. 8 of February 20, 2024 on reconsideration.
  51. Exhibit 2 — Womply Developer Order Form - OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Exhibit · PDFWomply's April 14, 2021 order form with Benworth Capital Partners setting a $250 per-loan API fee and tiered technology fees on PPP loans.
  52. Exhibit 3 — JAMS Corrected Final Arbitration Award - OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)ExhibitThe June 2024 corrected JAMS arbitration award granting Womply's fee claims against PPP lender Benworth Capital Partners.
  53. Exhibit 7 — OTO Analytics, LLC (Womply) v. Benworth Capital Partners LLCExhibit · PDFExhibit 7, Doc. 41-9, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Aug. 20, 2024: JAMS order on protected materials.
  54. Exhibit 8 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Exhibit · PDFExhibit 8, Doc. 41-10, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), 08/20/24: Order No. 6 denying requests.
  55. Proposed OrderJudgment · Dkt. 41.1 · PDFProposed judgment confirming a June 26, 2024 arbitration award, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 41-1.
  56. Exhibit - 9Exhibit · Dkt. 41.11 · PDF
  57. Exhibit - 10Exhibit · Dkt. 41.12 · PDF
  58. Exhibit - 4Exhibit · Dkt. 41.6 · PDFJAMS notice appointing Alexander L. Brainerd as arbitrator in the Womply v. Benworth arbitration, with deposit requests and fee schedule.
  59. Exhibit - 5Exhibit · Dkt. 41.7 · PDFExhibit 5, Doc. 41-7, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), 08/20/24: Discovery Order No. 1 on a motion to compel.
  60. Exhibit - 6Exhibit · Dkt. 41.8 · PDFExhibit 6, August 3, 2022 JAMS email relaying orders, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 41-8.
  61. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 42.1 · PDFProposed order granting the motion to file under seal, Doc. 42-1, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.).
  62. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 43.1 · PDFProposed order on sealing another party's material, Oto v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 43-1, August 20, 2024.
  63. Certificate of Interested Entities by Benworth Capital Partners…PDFBenworth Capital Partners' August 2024 certificate reporting no interested entities in Womply's petition case.
  64. Corporate Disclosure Statement by Benworth Capital Partners LLC…PDFCorporate Disclosure Statement of Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 45, 08/23/24: no corporation owns 10% or more.
  65. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Enlargement of Page Limits Applicable…PDFBenworth asks for longer page limits and more time to oppose Womply's motion to confirm the arbitration award.
  66. Declaration in Support of Admin Motion re Page LimitsDeclaration · PDFRobinson declaration for Benworth on page limits and timing, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), August 26, 2024.
  67. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 46.2 · PDFBenworth's proposed order of August 26, 2024 on its request for more pages and time to answer Womply's motion to confirm the award.
  68. OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 42 Administrative Motion to File Under…Response or reply · PDFBenworth's August 2024 opposition to Womply's request to seal arbitrator disqualification papers in their award dispute.
  69. OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 46 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for…Response or reply · PDFWomply opposes Benworth's request for longer page limits and more time to respond to the motion to confirm the arbitration award.
  70. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 49.1 · PDFProposed order denying Benworth's motion to enlarge page limits, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 49-1.
  71. Declaration of Alexander L CheneyDeclaration · Dkt. 49.2 · PDFCheney declaration opposing Benworth's page and time requests, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), August 29, 2024.
  72. Exhibit - 1Exhibit · Dkt. 49.3 · PDFExhibit 1, Doc. 49-3, Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners (N.D. Cal.): August 8 and August 12, 2024 emails on a Petition to Vacate.
  73. Exhibit - 2Exhibit · Dkt. 49.4 · PDFExhibit 2, Doc. 49-4, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), August 29, 2024: counsel's meet and confer emails.
  74. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 50.1 · PDFProposed order consolidating Oto Analytics v. Benworth cases, Nos. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO and 3:24-cv-04840-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 50-1, 08/29/24.
  75. Declaration of Alexander L CheneyDeclaration · Dkt. 50.2 · PDFDeclaration of Alexander L. Cheney on consolidating related cases, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 50-2.
  76. Exhibit - 1Exhibit · Dkt. 50.3 · PDFExhibit 1 meet and confer email, Benworth Capital Partners v. Oto Analytics, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Document 50-3, filed August 29, 2024.
  77. Exhibit Exhibit 9Exhibit · Dkt. 52.10 · PDF
  78. Exhibit Exhibit 10Exhibit · Dkt. 52.11 · PDF
  79. Exhibit Exhibit 11Exhibit · Dkt. 52.12 · PDF
  80. Exhibit Exhibit 12Exhibit · Dkt. 52.13 · PDF
  81. Exhibit Exhibit 14Exhibit · Dkt. 52.15 · PDF
  82. Exhibit Exhibit 15Exhibit · Dkt. 52.16 · PDF
  83. Exhibit Exhibit 17Exhibit · Dkt. 52.18 · PDF
  84. Exhibit Exhibit 18Exhibit · Dkt. 52.19 · PDF
  85. Exhibit Exhibit 1Exhibit · Dkt. 52.2 · PDF
  86. Exhibit Exhibit 19Exhibit · Dkt. 52.20 · PDF
  87. Exhibit Exhibit 20Exhibit · Dkt. 52.21 · PDF
  88. Exhibit Exhibit 21Exhibit · Dkt. 52.22 · PDF
  89. Exhibit Exhibit 2Exhibit · Dkt. 52.3
  90. Exhibit Exhibit 3Exhibit · Dkt. 52.4 · PDFSBA Form 2483 Paycheck Protection Program borrower application, revised March 18, 2021, filed in Oto Analytics v. Benworth Capital Partners.
  91. Exhibit Exhibit 4Exhibit · Dkt. 52.5 · PDFExhibit (September 2024): a blank Paycheck Protection Program second draw borrower application form, SBA Form 2483-SD.
  92. Exhibit Exhibit 5Exhibit · Dkt. 52.6 · PDF
  93. Exhibit Exhibit 6Exhibit · Dkt. 52.7 · PDF
  94. Exhibit Exhibit 7Exhibit · Dkt. 52.8 · PDF
  95. Exhibit Exhibit 8Exhibit · Dkt. 52.9 · PDF
  96. Proposed Order Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 53.1 · PDFProposed sealing order listing arbitration materials, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) (N.D. Cal.), filed September 6, 2024.
  97. Declaration Declaration of Dwayne A. RobinsonDeclaration · PDFBenworth counsel Dwayne A. Robinson's September 6, 2024 declaration listing arbitration material Womply may claim is confidential.
  98. Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to File Under Seal (Redacted…PDFWomply and Benworth's September 2024 joint motion to redact personal information from exhibits in their arbitration award case.
  99. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 54.1 · PDFProposed order granting joint motion to seal two Robinson declaration exhibits, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), 09/10/24.
  100. Statement of Non-Opposition re 50 MOTION to Consolidate Cases…Memorandum or brief · PDFBenworth does not oppose consolidating Womply's petition to confirm with Benworth's own petition to vacate the award.
  101. Declaration of Alexander L Cheney in SupportDeclaration · PDFDeclaration of Alexander L. Cheney attaching three exhibits to a reply on confirming an award, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 56-1.
  102. Stipulation with Proposed Order Regarding Cross-Petitions to Confirm — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 61)Stipulation · PDFJoint stipulation on cross-petitions to confirm and vacate award, Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), October 31, 2024.
  103. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 62, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)Order · PDFWomply and Benworth stipulate to treat briefing as cross-petitions to confirm and vacate the arbitration award, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO, Nov. 5, 2024.
  104. Proposed OrderProposed order · Dkt. 63.1 · PDFWomply's proposed order of November 20, 2024 that would deny Benworth's petition to vacate and confirm their arbitration award; not a ruling.
  105. Joint Stipulation to Dismiss With Prejudice - OTO Analytics…Stipulation · PDFJoint stipulation dismissing Oto Analytics' action against Benworth Capital Partners with prejudice, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), January 2, 2025.

More documents from this docket

17 more documents from the same CourtListener docket (gov.uscourts.cand.431982) are in the archive but are not among the 105 filings above.

  1. Petition to Confirm Arbitration AwardPetitionWomply petitions to confirm its June 26, 2024 arbitration award against Benworth Capital Partners, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), filed July 1, 2024.
  2. Order on Motion to Admit Congressional Staff Report (Exhibit 12)Exhibit
  3. 2024.07.01 Motion to SealMotion
  4. 2024.07.01 Admin Mot to Seal Other PartyMotion
  5. 2024.07.01 Cert of Interested Entities or PersonsCertification
  6. Court Filing — CAND Case 431982, Doc. 18Consent or declination
  7. Related Case OrderOrder
  8. Order re administrative motion for clarification of deadlineOrderOrder on Benworth's deadline to answer Womply's petition to confirm an arbitral award, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), August 15, 2024.
  9. Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of JudgmentMotionWomply motion to confirm its arbitration award against Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), August 20, 2024, including $6,256,665.04 in fees.
  10. 2024.08.20 Motion to SealMotion
  11. 2024.08.20 Admin Mot to Seal Other PartyMotion
  12. Opposition to Motion to Confirm Arbitration AwardResponse or replyBenworth opposes confirmation of Womply's arbitration award, arguing the arbitrator exceeded his powers, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), Sept. 6, 2024.
  13. Respondent’S Administrative Motion To Consider WhetherMotion
  14. Exhibit 3 — Womply's Opposition to Benworth's Motion to StayExhibitWomply's 2023 arbitration opposition to Benworth's motion to stay over an SBA fee investigation, Exhibit 3, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.).
  15. Exhibit 2 — Benworth's Motion to Disqualify William M. Manger, Jr.ExhibitExhibit 2 in Oto Analytics v. Benworth, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO: Benworth's January 25, 2023 motion to disqualify Womply's expert Manger.
  16. Sur-Reply in Support of Cross-Petition to Confirm Arbitration AwardResponse or replyWomply's sur-reply asking the court to confirm the arbitration award against Benworth, No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal.), November 20, 2024.
  17. undatedMotion to Consolidate Related CasesMotionWomply moves, with Benworth's consent, to consolidate the award confirmation and vacatur cases, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, August 29, 2024.

Other cases in the archive from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top