Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 4.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 4.1)

Filed July 1, 2024 in Oto Benworth; one of 102 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-07-01

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 4-1 · 2024-07-01 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-03975
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (pro hac vice forthcoming) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (pro hac vice forthcoming) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC,
 
 
Petitioner, 
v. 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS 
LLC, 
Respondent. 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
PETTIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 4-1     Filed 07/01/24     Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PLAINTIFF’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-03975 
 
Before the Court is Petitioner’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Having 
considered Petitioner’s Motion, the Court finds that the material identified in the Motion should be 
sealed. Accordingly, the Court orders that the following should be sealed.  
Docket No. 
Document 
Page/Line Nos. 
1 
Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and For 
Entry of Judgment 
Page 10, Line(s) 3–28 
Page 11, Line(s) 1–7 
1-10 
Exhibit 9 to the Cheney Declaration, Benworth’s 
March 10, 2023 Letter to JAMS (“Motion to 
Disqualify”) 
In its entirety 
1-11 
Exhibit 10 to the Cheney Declaration, Petitioner’s 
March 14, 2023, Opposition to the Motion to 
Disqualify (“Opp. to Mot. to Disqualify”) 
In its entirety 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED: ________________  
 
_____________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Honorable ______________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 4-1     Filed 07/01/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.4.1.pdf
Size
289,237 bytes
SHA-256
35724d73877f94db36631dbb720fa534e9eeebbe144034046b8c06a5cd247410
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.4.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top