Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 49.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 49.1)

Filed August 29, 2024 in Oto Benworth; one of 102 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-08-29

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 49-1 · 2024-08-29 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, 
Petitioner, 
v. 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, 
Respondent. 
 Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION FOR ENLARGMENT OF PAGE 
LIMITS APPLICABLE TO 
RESPONDENT’S CROSS-MOTION TO 
VACATE, AND FOR EXTENSION OF 
TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITIONER’S 
MOTION TO CONFIRM 
 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 49-1     Filed 08/29/24     Page 1 of 2

 
 
1 
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Respondent Benworth Capital Partners LLC’s (“Benworth”) Administrative Motion for 
Enlargement of Page Limits Applicable to Respondent’s Cross-Motion to Vacate and for 
Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Motion to Confirm came before the Court on 
August 26, 2024 (“Motion”).  Having considered the Motion and the documents filed with the 
Court in connection therewith, 
It is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED THAT:  
1. 
Benworth’s Motion is DENIED.  
2. 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Benworth’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion 
to Confirm Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 41) is due on September 
3, 2024, and remains subject to the 25-page limit imposed by Civil Local Rules 7-3(a) and 7-4(b). 
 
 
Dated: _____________, 2024 
 
____________________________ 
Hon Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
United States District Judge 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 49-1     Filed 08/29/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.49.1.pdf
Size
351,218 bytes
SHA-256
93d608af94226ec46d3fdc10e5bcf74f53ed8f234d53890a308c097c45c7bb59
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.49.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top