Court filing
Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 49.1)
Filed August 29, 2024 in Oto Benworth; one of 102 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-08-29 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 49-1 · 2024-08-29 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) acheney@willkie.com 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 858-7400 Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) slombardi@willkie.com 787 7th Avenue New York, NY 10019 (212) 728-8000 Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) jlevy@willkie.com 1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1238 (202) 303-1000 Attorneys for Petitioner Oto Analytics, LLC OTO ANALYTICS, LLC, Petitioner, v. BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, Respondent. Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO [PROPOSED] ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ENLARGMENT OF PAGE LIMITS APPLICABLE TO RESPONDENT’S CROSS-MOTION TO VACATE, AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CONFIRM Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 49-1 Filed 08/29/24 Page 1 of 2 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Respondent Benworth Capital Partners LLC’s (“Benworth”) Administrative Motion for Enlargement of Page Limits Applicable to Respondent’s Cross-Motion to Vacate and for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Motion to Confirm came before the Court on August 26, 2024 (“Motion”). Having considered the Motion and the documents filed with the Court in connection therewith, It is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED and DECREED THAT: 1. Benworth’s Motion is DENIED. 2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Benworth’s Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion to Confirm Final Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment (ECF No. 41) is due on September 3, 2024, and remains subject to the 25-page limit imposed by Civil Local Rules 7-3(a) and 7-4(b). Dated: _____________, 2024 ____________________________ Hon Araceli Martínez-Olguín United States District Judge Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 49-1 Filed 08/29/24 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.431982.49.1.pdf
- Size
- 351,218 bytes
- SHA-256
- 93d608af94226ec46d3fdc10e5bcf74f53ed8f234d53890a308c097c45c7bb59
- Original
- PACER (login required)