Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Exhibit - 2 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 49-4, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)

Court filing

Exhibit - 2 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 49-4, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)

Filed August 29, 2024 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC; one of 102 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-08-29

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 49-4 · 2024-08-29 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

EXHIBIT 2 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 49-4     Filed 08/29/24     Page 1 of 3

1
From:
Levy, Joshua S.
Sent:
Monday, August 26, 2024 5:27 PM
To:
Daniel Herrera; Palmeri, Vincent; Cheney, Alexander; Lombardi, Stuart; Morris, Daniel L.; 
Hanley, Katherine; Morton, Adriana
Cc:
Jorge L. Piedra; Dwayne Robinson; Michael  Lorigas; Simon S. Grille
Subject:
RE: Benworth Capital Partners LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC Meet and Confer
Daniel, 
Thank you for reaching out.   We have been Ɵed up today with our opposiƟon to Benworth’s PeƟƟon to Vacate.  Since 
that brief was nearly complete when you sent your proposal, we did not see any reason not to file it.  We are in the 
process of filing now so your request #1 is moot. 
For Request #2, we do not agree to a 10-day extension or a 60-page limit.  We sent you a proposal regarding the parƟes 
consenƟng to a magistrate judge and Womply agreeing not to move to strike Benworth’s peƟƟon as exceeding the page 
limits under the rules.  Do you have a response or a counter-proposal?  Your email below does not menƟon this, so it 
was unclear if Benworth was rejecƟng our proposal.  
For Request #3, please provide your proposal regarding sealing so we can have a producƟve discussion about it later this 
week. 
We can be available to discuss any of this tomorrow. 
Regards, 
Josh 
Joshua S. Levy 
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 
1875 K Street, N.W. | Washington, DC 20006-1238 
Direct: +1 202 303 1147 | Mobile: +1 516 680 5751 
jlevy@willkie.com | vCard | www.willkie.com bio 
From: Daniel Herrera <dherrera@kttlaw.com>  
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2024 11:47 AM 
To: Levy, Joshua S. <JLevy@willkie.com>; Palmeri, Vincent <VPalmeri@willkie.com>; Cheney, Alexander 
<ACheney@willkie.com>; Lombardi, Stuart <slombardi@willkie.com>; Morris, Daniel L. <DMorris@willkie.com>; Hanley, 
Katherine <KHanley@willkie.com>; Morton, Adriana <AMorton@willkie.com> 
Cc: Jorge L. Piedra <jpiedra@kttlaw.com>; Dwayne Robinson <drobinson@kttlaw.com>; Michael Lorigas 
<mlorigas@kttlaw.com>; Simon S. Grille <sgrille@girardsharp.com> 
Subject: Benworth Capital Partners LLC v. Oto Analytics, LLC Meet and Confer 
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL ***
Counsel, 
We would like to have a meet and confer on Monday via zoom to discuss the following items: 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 49-4     Filed 08/29/24     Page 2 of 3

2
1. Response to Womply’s MoƟon to Confirm. Instead of doing briefing separately on Womply's peƟƟon to confirm and 
Benworth's peƟƟon to vacate, we propose doing it all together. In other words, Benworth's response to Womply’s 
moƟon would also be a cross-peƟƟon to vacate. Under our proposal, Womply would respond in opposiƟon to that 
(instead of the peƟƟon filed in the related acƟon), and then Benworth will file a reply that solely addresses our cross-
peƟƟon components. Are you agreeable to this? 
  
2. Extension of Time and Enlargement of Page Limits. Benworth intends to move the Court for an expansion of the page 
limits for its response/cross peƟƟon. Along with the request for addiƟonal pages, we intend to ask the Court to extend 
our deadline to oppose Womply’s moƟon to confirm unƟl 10 days aŌer it rules on the request for addiƟonal pages. 
Would Womply be willing to sƟpulate to this, and a limit of 60 pages? 
  
3. Sealing Documents. As a follow-up to our conversaƟon last week, we would like to discuss our compeƟng moƟons to 
seal. 
  
4. ConsolidaƟon. Benworth agrees to consolidate the two acƟons. 
 
Please let me know you availability. 
  
Best, 
 
DANIEL HERRERA, ESQ. 
 
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Floor 9, Miami, Florida 33134 
Phone 305.372.1800 | Direct 305.728.2921 | Email dherrera@kttlaw.com 
Firm Bio | Personal LinkedIn | KTT LinkedIn
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 49-4     Filed 08/29/24     Page 3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.49.4.pdf
Size
980,912 bytes
SHA-256
3757e4c78a0d9255c7449ce9c7c4d19c3ca4686174a6d8666cf8941f3f84e948
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.49.4.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 50.1)same docket · 2024-08-29
  2. Exhibit - 1 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 49-3, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-08-29
  3. Declaration of Alexander L Cheney — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 50-2, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-08-29
  4. Declaration of Alexander L Cheney — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 49-2, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-08-29
  5. Exhibit - 1 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 50-3, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-08-29
  6. Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 49.1)same docket · 2024-08-29
  7. Motion to Consolidate Related Cases — OTO Analytics v. Benworthsame docket · 2024-08-29
  8. OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 46 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION for Enlargement of Page Limits Applicable to… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 49)same docket · 2024-08-29
  9. Exhibit 9 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-10, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  10. Exhibit 10 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-11, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  11. OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 42 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) filed byBenworth Capital… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 47)same case · 2024-08-26
  12. Exhibit 11 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-12, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  13. Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 46.2)same case · 2024-08-26
  14. Exhibit 12 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-13, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  15. Declaration in Support of Admin Motion re Page Limits — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 46-1, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-08-26
  16. Exhibit 14 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-15, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  17. Inistrative Motion For Enlargement Of Page Limits Applicable Tosame docket · 2024-08-26

Part of: Oto Benworth · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · Lender and platform litigation · Exhibits and declarations · 2024 · Court filings

Back to top