Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 35.5)

Summary

[PROPOSED] Order on Benworth's Administrative Motion for Clarification and/or for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Womply's Petition, Document 35-5, filed 07/26/24 in Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO (N.D. Cal., San Francisco Division). The caption lists Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as Attorneys for Petitioner Oto Analytics, LLC and names Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín. The proposed order recites that the matter is before the Court on Benworth's Administrative Motion (ECF No. 26) and that the Court has reviewed that motion and Womply's Opposition. It would order that Benworth's Administrative Motion for Clarification and/or for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Womply's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is DENIED. The date line is left blank above the signature line for Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON BENWORTH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 
CLARIFICATION AND/OR FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 
WOMPLY’S PETITION  
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner  
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC,  
Petitioner,  
vs.  
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC  
Respondent. 
 
 
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO  
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 
BENWORTH’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 
AND/OR FOR EXTENSION OF 
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 
WOMPLY’S PETITION 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 35-5     Filed 07/26/24     Page 1 of 2

 
1 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON BENWORTH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR 
CLARIFICATION AND/OR FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 
WOMPLY’S PETITION  
Case No. 3:24-cv-03975-AMO 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Benworth’s Administrative Motion for Clarification 
and/or for Extension of Deadline to Respond to Womply’s Petition (ECF No. 26).  The Court, 
having reviewed Benworth’s Administrative Motion and Womply’s Opposition thereto, and being 
otherwise fully advised, it is hereby 
 
 
ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED THAT: 
1. 
Benworth’s Administrative Motion for Clarification and/or for Extension of Deadline 
to Respond to Womply’s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award is DENIED. 
 
DONE AND ORDERED in San Francisco, California this ____ day of _____, 2024. 
 
______________________________ 
Hon. Araceli Martínez-Olguín 
United States District Judge 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 35-5     Filed 07/26/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.431982.35.5.pdf

Size

136,278 bytes

SHA-256

ecbd39468db6d4c8e440f91b9d02471d30d2a9be3f0a81d7f89efd96b5a29496

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.431982.35.5.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)