Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Proposed Order Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53.1)

Filed September 6, 2024 in Oto Benworth; one of 102 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-09-06

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO · Doc. 53-1 · 2024-09-06 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO 
ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, 
 
 
 
 
Petitioner, 
 
 
v. 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, 
 
 
 
 
Respondent. 
 
Case No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53-1     Filed 09/06/24     Page 1 of 4

 
1 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Having considered Respondent’s September 6, 2024, Administrative Motion to Consider 
Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 
Document  
title or 
description 
Dkt. No.  
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
decl. in 
support of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate 
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of reason 
for sealing  
Granted/ 
Denied 
Opposition 
to Motion to 
Confirm 
Arbitration 
Award and 
for Entry of 
Judgment 
52 
53-2 
 
Womply 
Partial 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Excerpts 
from 
Arbitration 
Closing 
Argument 
Transcript 
(June 29, 
2023) 
52-2 
53-4 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
2/14/2021 
Email from 
T. Scammell 
to M. Roth 
re PPP Fast 
Lane 
(JX030) 
52-6 
53-5 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Arbitration 
Hearing 
Transcript 
Day 2 
52-7 
53-6 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Womply 
Disclaimer 
re: Tax 
Documents 
Qualificatio
n Issue 
(JX355) 
52-8 
53-7 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
11/30/2022 
T. Scammell 
Decl. 
(JX323) 
52-9 
53-8 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Fast Lane 
platform 
borrower-
facing 
screenshots 
(JX340) 
52-10 
53-9 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53-1     Filed 09/06/24     Page 2 of 4

 
2 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document  
title or 
description 
Dkt. No.  
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
decl. in 
support of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate 
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of reason 
for sealing  
Granted/ 
Denied 
Arbitration 
Hearing 
Transcript 
Day 3 
52-11 
53-10 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
3/18/2021 
Email from 
Connie 
Spencer-
Adams to 
Toya De La 
Cruz re: 
Applying 
through 
Womply 
(JX060) 
52-13 
53-11 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Arbitration 
Hearing 
Transcript 
Day 4 
52-15 
53-12 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Benworth 
Capital 
Partners, 
LLC’s Post-
Hearing 
Brief 
52-16 
53-13 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Benworth's 
Motion for 
Reconsiderat
ion 
52-18 
53-14 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Womply 
PPP 
Program - 
03. Training 
- 3.06 
Application 
Process 
(JX356) 
52-19 
53-15 
 
 
 
 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Benworth 
Capital 
Partners, 
LLC’s Pre-
Hearing 
Brief 
52-20 
53-16 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53-1     Filed 09/06/24     Page 3 of 4

 
3 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document  
title or 
description 
Dkt. No.  
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
decl. in 
support of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate 
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of reason 
for sealing  
Granted/ 
Denied 
Benworth 
Capital 
Partners, 
LLC’s 
Response to 
Womply’s 
Post-
Hearing 
Brief 
52-21 
53-17 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
Benworth’s 
Motion to 
Stay 
52-22 
53-18 
 
Womply 
Full 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: _______________________ 
_____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53-1     Filed 09/06/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.53.1.pdf
Size
177,725 bytes
SHA-256
5e663dc9fa5687a487430536d599846a3582bc1238985832ebfb4246c80db64b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.53.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. Declaration Declaration of Dwayne A. Robinson — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53.3)same docket · 2024-09-06
  2. Exhibit 13 — SBA SOP 50 10 6 (Lender and Development Company Loan Programs) — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  3. Exhibit 8 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-9, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  4. Exhibit 16 — Benworth–SBA OCRM Emails on Third-Party PPP Support (May 2021) — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  5. Exhibit 7 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-8, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  6. Exhibit 22 — Select Subcommittee Staff Report on Fintechs and PPP Fraud — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  7. Exhibit 6 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-7, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  8. Opposition to Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  9. Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to File Under Seal (Redacted Version) filed by Oto Analytics, LLC.… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 54)same case · 2024-09-10
  10. Proposed Order — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 54.1)same case · 2024-09-10
  11. Statement of Non-Opposition re 50 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed byBenworth Capital… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 55)same case · 2024-09-11
  12. Declaration of Alexander L Cheney in Support — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 56-1, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-13
  13. Exhibit 5 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-6, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  14. Stipulation with Proposed Order Regarding Cross-Petitions to Confirm — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 61)same case · 2024-10-31
  15. Exhibit 4 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-5, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-09-06
  16. Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 62, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same case · 2024-11-05
  17. Declaration of Dwayne A. Robinson in Support of Opposition — OTO Analytics v. Benworth (N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  18. Exhibit 3 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-4, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  19. Exhibit 2 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-3, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06
  20. Exhibit 21 — Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC (Dkt. 52-22, N.D. Cal. No. 3:24-cv-03975)same docket · 2024-09-06

Part of: Oto Benworth · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) · Lender and platform litigation · Orders and opinions · 2024 · Court filings

Back to top