Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 21.1)

Court filing

Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 21.1)

Summary

A one-page standard clerk's notice of eligibility for video recording, filed 07/16/24 as Document 21-1 in Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Northern District of California. It states that the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project under General Order 65. Consent of the parties to recording will be presumed unless a party submits an objection form, and parties that decline are asked to give their reasons for research purposes.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed July 16, 2024 in Oto Benworth; one of 102 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-07-16

Cite this document

“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 21.1).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 21-1, filed 2024-07-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-oto-benworth-cand-431982/2024-07-16-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-21-1-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-21-1/, SHA-256 b57ed0f0d85a89e8b2d030c280bf301757719aa0cd73871328bf43e3e47e835a.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
  
NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING  
  
This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot 
Project.  See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.  The parties’ consent is required 
before any proceedings in this case may be recorded.  If a party, the presiding judge, or a member 
of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be presumed 
unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed by the 
Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures.    
  
Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to 
the Court the reasons for declining to participate.  If you decline to participate, you should 
candidly convey the reasons for your decision.  Whether you agree to participate or decline to 
participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever.    
  
  
  
  
  
   
Clerk, Clerk of Court  
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 21-1     Filed 07/16/24     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.21.1.pdf
Size
211,766 bytes
SHA-256
b57ed0f0d85a89e8b2d030c280bf301757719aa0cd73871328bf43e3e47e835a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.21.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top