Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Cand 431982 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oto Analytics, LLC.. (Ch…

Court filing

CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oto Analytics, LLC.. (Cheney,… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 18)

Summary

This is the Northern District of California's consent or declination to magistrate judge jurisdiction form, filed on 07/16/24 as Document 18 in Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Oto Analytics, LLC v. Benworth Capital Partners LLC. It was signed by Alexander L. Cheney as counsel for Oto Analytics, LLC and lists the case as 3:24-cv-03975-LJC. The form offers a choice between consenting under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings and declining in favor of reassignment to a district judge. The text layer shows a check mark but does not make clear which box was selected.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-07-16

Cite this document

“CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Oto Analytics, LLC.. (Cheney,… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 18).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 18, filed 2024-07-16. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-oto-benworth-cand-431982/2024-07-16-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-18-0-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-18-0/, SHA-256 dfa917731786ee4adc0f9c490bc8a90728ae8240b2f5d33f0543b9154bd44d86.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
Plaintiff(s), 
v. 
 
 
Defendant(s). 
 
Case No.   
 
 
CONSENT OR DECLINATION  
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
JURISDICTION 
 
 
INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you 
are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent 
or decline to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. 
 
܆ CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a 
United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and 
entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 
 
OR 
 
܆DECLINE Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States 
magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be 
reassigned to a United States district judge. 
 
DATE: _______________, 20____ 
NAME:  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Signature 
 
 
COUNSEL FOR 
(OR “PRO SE”):  
 
 
Oto Analytics, LLC
Benworth Capital Partners LLC
3:24-cv-03975-LJC
✔
July 16
24
Alexander L. Cheney
Alexander L. Cheney
Oto Analytics, LLC
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 18     Filed 07/16/24     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.18.0.pdf
Size
166,862 bytes
SHA-256
dfa917731786ee4adc0f9c490bc8a90728ae8240b2f5d33f0543b9154bd44d86
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.18.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top