Court filing
Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53)
Summary
Benworth Capital Partners, LLC's administrative motion to consider whether another party's material should be sealed, filed 09/06/24 as Document 53 in Oto Analytics, LLC d/b/a Womply v. Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Benworth asks the Court to consider sealing parts of its opposition to Womply's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment, citing JAMS Rule 26(a) and the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the arbitration. The motion lists the cited passages and exhibits, including arbitration hearing transcripts, emails and Benworth's own briefs from the arbitration. Benworth states that none of the listed materials were designated as confidential by Benworth and that it takes no position on whether they meet the sealing standard.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-09-06 |
Cite this document
“Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 53, filed 2024-09-06. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-oto-benworth-cand-431982/2024-09-06-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-53-0-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-53-0/
, SHA-256 0fe3beaa22a4ad1497eceaf86e1428ee2596d477f697c608311bb1543e141f8e.Full text
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) (Pro Hac Vice) jpiedra@kttlaw.com Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) (Pro Hac Vice) drobinson@kttlaw.com Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) (Pro Hac Vice) mlorigas@kttlaw.com KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor Miami, Florida 33134 Telephone: 305-372-1800 Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) sgrille@girardsharp.com GIRARD SHARP LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, Petitioner, v. BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Respondent. Case No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 53 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 4 1 RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent Benworth Capital Partners, LLC (“Benworth”) will and hereby does move the Court to consider whether Benworth’s Opposition to Respondent Oto Analytics, LLC f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc., d/b/a Womply (“Womply”)’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment, which contains certain material designated as “Confidential” or that otherwise discloses potentially confidential, proprietary, or private information, should be sealed. Benworth files this motion to comply with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, as well as the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the underlying arbitration and the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures, which governed the arbitration. Material To Be Filed Under Seal Womply filed this action seeking to confirm an arbitral award. The arbitration was governed by the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures. JAMS Rule 26(a) provides that “JAMS and the Arbitrator shall maintain the confidential nature of the Arbitration proceeding and the Award, including the Hearing, except as necessary in connection with a judicial challenge to or enforcement of an Award, or unless otherwise required by law or judicial decision.” In addition, Paragraph 12.3 of the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the arbitration requires materials designated as “Confidential” (i.e., “Protected Material”) to be filed under seal. “Protected Material” includes information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible thing that contain trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive information, personally sensitive or private information, or any other information, documents, or testimony not previously disclosed to the public. See Stipulated Protective Order, ¶¶ 2.2, 2.5, & 2.12. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Benworth submits this Administrative Motion because its Opposition contains certain information that Womply has claimed or may claim is confidential. Womply has the burden to justify its claims of confidentiality and to establish that the designated information is sealable. Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3) & (c)(1). In the interim, Benworth is provisionally submitting the following information under seal: Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 53 Filed 09/06/24 Page 2 of 4 2 RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Document Description Citation Opposition Benworth’s Opposition to Womply’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment 5:18-19; 5:20-21; 5:22; 8:2-5; 8:6-7; 8:9-14; 8:15-21; 8:22- 25; 8:26-28; 9:2-7; 9:8-11; 9:12-19; 10:12-13; 11:18-19; 12:9-10; 14:4; 16:25-27; 17:1- 3; 17:5-7; 17:8-12; 21:23-24; 25:7-9; 25:9-10 Exhibit 1 Excerpts from Arbitration Closing Argument Transcript (June 29, 2023) Exhibit 5 2/14/2021 Email from T. Scammell to M. Roth re: PPP Fast Lane JX030 Exhibit 6 Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 2 (March 21, 2023) Exhibit 7 Womply Disclaimer re: Tax Documents Qualification Issue JX355 Exhibit 8 Declaration of Toby Scammell dated November 30, 2022 JX323 Exhibit 9 Borrower-facing screenshots of Fast Lane JX340 Exhibit 10 Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 3 (March 22, 2023) Exhibit 12 3/18/2021 Email from Connie Spencer- Adams to Toya De La Cruz re: Applying through Womply JX060 Exhibit 14 Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing Transcript Day 4 (March 23, 2023) Exhibit 15 Benworth’s Post-Hearing Brief Exhibit 17 Benworth’s Motion for Reconsideration Exhibit 18 Womply PPP Program – 03. Training – 3.06 Application JX356 Exhibit 19 Benworth’s Pre-Hearing Brief Exhibit 20 Benworth’s Response to Womply’s Post- Hearing Brief Exhibit 21 Benworth’s Motion to Stay None of the materials in the above chart have been designated as confidential by Benworth. Benworth takes no position at this time on whether any of these designated portions satisfy the requirements for sealing, and specifically reserves the right to challenge any designation under the Stipulated Protective Order as well as the propriety of sealing any of these materials under Civil Local Rule 79-5 and applicable law. Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 53 Filed 09/06/24 Page 3 of 4 3 RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In compliance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, the following attachments accompany this motion: 1. The declaration in support of this Motion; 2. A proposed order that lists in table format each document to be sealed; 3. Unredacted version of Benworth’s Opposition to Womply’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment; 4. Unredacted versions of each Exhibit listed in the above chart. Dated: September 6, 2024 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Dwayne A. Robinson Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) (Pro Hac Vice) jpiedra@kttlaw.com Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) (Pro Hac Vice) drobinson@kttlaw.com Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) (Pro Hac Vice) mlorigas@kttlaw.com KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor Miami, Florida 33134 Telephone: 305-372-1800 -and- Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) sgrille@girardsharp.com GIRARD SHARP LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-4800 Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO Document 53 Filed 09/06/24 Page 4 of 4
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.431982.53.0.pdf
- Size
- 166,302 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0fe3beaa22a4ad1497eceaf86e1428ee2596d477f697c608311bb1543e141f8e
- Original
- PACER (login required)