Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Oto Benworth Cand 431982 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed fil…

Court filing

Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53)

Summary

Benworth Capital Partners, LLC's administrative motion to consider whether another party's material should be sealed, filed 09/06/24 as Document 53 in Oto Analytics, LLC d/b/a Womply v. Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Benworth asks the Court to consider sealing parts of its opposition to Womply's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment, citing JAMS Rule 26(a) and the Stipulated Protective Order entered in the arbitration. The motion lists the cited passages and exhibits, including arbitration hearing transcripts, emails and Benworth's own briefs from the arbitration. Benworth states that none of the listed materials were designated as confidential by Benworth and that it takes no position on whether they meet the sealing standard.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2024-09-06

Cite this document

“Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 53).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 53, filed 2024-09-06. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-oto-benworth-cand-431982/2024-09-06-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-53-0-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-53-0/, SHA-256 0fe3beaa22a4ad1497eceaf86e1428ee2596d477f697c608311bb1543e141f8e.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: 305-372-1800 
 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800 
 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO 
ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, 
 
 
 
 
Petitioner, 
 
 
v. 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, 
 
 
 
 
Respondent. 
 
Case No. 3:24-cv-3975 (AMO) 
 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
 
N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-11 and 79-5 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53     Filed 09/06/24     Page 1 of 4

 
1 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES, AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: 
 
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Respondent Benworth Capital Partners, LLC (“Benworth”) will 
and hereby does move the Court to consider whether Benworth’s Opposition to Respondent Oto 
Analytics, LLC f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc., d/b/a Womply (“Womply”)’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration 
Award and for Entry of Judgment, which contains certain material designated as “Confidential” or that 
otherwise discloses potentially confidential, proprietary, or private information, should be sealed. 
Benworth files this motion to comply with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, as well as the Stipulated 
Protective Order entered in the underlying arbitration and the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules 
and Procedures, which governed the arbitration. 
Material To Be Filed Under Seal 
 
Womply filed this action seeking to confirm an arbitral award. The arbitration was governed by 
the JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures. JAMS Rule 26(a) provides that “JAMS 
and the Arbitrator shall maintain the confidential nature of the Arbitration proceeding and the Award, 
including the Hearing, except as necessary in connection with a judicial challenge to or enforcement of 
an Award, or unless otherwise required by law or judicial decision.” In addition, Paragraph 12.3 of the 
Stipulated Protective Order entered in the arbitration requires materials designated as “Confidential” 
(i.e., “Protected Material”) to be filed under seal. “Protected Material” includes information (regardless 
of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible thing that contain trade secrets, proprietary 
business information, competitively sensitive information, personally sensitive or private information, 
or any other information, documents, or testimony not previously disclosed to the public. See Stipulated 
Protective Order, ¶¶ 2.2, 2.5, & 2.12.  
 
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Benworth submits this Administrative Motion 
because its Opposition contains certain information that Womply has claimed or may claim is 
confidential. Womply has the burden to justify its claims of confidentiality and to establish that the 
designated information is sealable. Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3) & (c)(1). In the interim, Benworth is 
provisionally submitting the following information under seal: 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53     Filed 09/06/24     Page 2 of 4

 
2 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document 
Description 
Citation 
Opposition 
Benworth’s Opposition to Womply’s 
Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award 
and for Entry of Judgment 
5:18-19; 5:20-21; 5:22; 8:2-5; 
8:6-7; 8:9-14; 8:15-21; 8:22-
25; 8:26-28; 9:2-7; 9:8-11; 
9:12-19; 10:12-13; 11:18-19; 
12:9-10; 14:4; 16:25-27; 17:1-
3; 17:5-7; 17:8-12; 21:23-24; 
25:7-9; 25:9-10 
Exhibit 1 
Excerpts from Arbitration Closing 
Argument Transcript (June 29, 2023) 
 
Exhibit 5 
2/14/2021 Email from T. Scammell to M. 
Roth re: PPP Fast Lane 
JX030 
Exhibit 6 
Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing 
Transcript Day 2 (March 21, 2023) 
 
Exhibit 7 
Womply Disclaimer re: Tax Documents 
Qualification Issue 
JX355 
Exhibit 8 
Declaration of Toby Scammell dated 
November 30, 2022 
JX323 
Exhibit 9 
Borrower-facing screenshots of Fast 
Lane 
JX340 
Exhibit 10 
Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing 
Transcript Day 3 (March 22, 2023) 
 
Exhibit 12 
3/18/2021 Email from Connie Spencer-
Adams to Toya De La Cruz re: Applying 
through Womply 
JX060 
Exhibit 14 
Excerpts from Arbitration Hearing 
Transcript Day 4 (March 23, 2023) 
 
Exhibit 15 
Benworth’s Post-Hearing Brief 
 
Exhibit 17 
Benworth’s Motion for Reconsideration 
 
Exhibit 18 
Womply PPP Program – 03. Training – 
3.06 Application 
JX356 
Exhibit 19 
Benworth’s Pre-Hearing Brief 
 
Exhibit 20 
Benworth’s Response to Womply’s Post-
Hearing Brief 
 
Exhibit 21 
Benworth’s Motion to Stay 
 
 
None of the materials in the above chart have been designated as confidential by Benworth. 
Benworth takes no position at this time on whether any of these designated portions satisfy the 
requirements for sealing, and specifically reserves the right to challenge any designation under the 
Stipulated Protective Order as well as the propriety of sealing any of these materials under Civil Local 
Rule 79-5 and applicable law. 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53     Filed 09/06/24     Page 3 of 4

 
3 
RESPONDENT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER  
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
In compliance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, the following attachments accompany this 
motion: 
1. 
The declaration in support of this Motion; 
2. 
A proposed order that lists in table format each document to be sealed; 
3. 
Unredacted version of Benworth’s Opposition to Womply’s Motion to Confirm 
Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgment; 
4. 
Unredacted versions of each Exhibit listed in the above chart. 
 
Dated: September 6, 2024 
Respectfully submitted, 
/s/ Dwayne A. Robinson 
 
 
 
Jorge L. Piedra (Florida Bar No. 88315) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
Dwayne A. Robinson (Florida Bar No. 99976) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
Michael R. Lorigas (Florida Bar No. 123597) 
(Pro Hac Vice) 
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: 305-372-1800 
 
 
 
-and- 
 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800  
 
Attorneys for Benworth Capital Partners, LLC 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 53     Filed 09/06/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.53.0.pdf
Size
166,302 bytes
SHA-256
0fe3beaa22a4ad1497eceaf86e1428ee2596d477f697c608311bb1543e141f8e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.431982.53.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top