Court filing

Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 43)

Summary

In this administrative motion dated August 20, 2024 and filed as Document 43 in Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO in the Northern District of California, Oto Analytics, LLC, doing business as Womply, asked the court to consider whether material Benworth Capital Partners had designated confidential should be sealed. The motion accompanies Womply's Notice of Motion and Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award And For Entry of Judgment. Womply provisionally filed under seal portions of that motion, the Cheney Declaration, the Corrected Final Award dated June 26, 2024 and arbitration orders dated January 17, 2023 and January 31, 2023. It notes under Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) that Benworth bears the burden of showing the material is sealable.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2024-08-20

Cite this document

“Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by… — Oto Benworth (Dkt. 43).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-03975-AMO, Doc. 43, filed 2024-08-20. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-oto-benworth-cand-431982/2024-08-20-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-43-0-gov-uscourts-cand-431982-43-0/, SHA-256 3e32e3d841981540f9d43e581f36f5f643f59286036b0b63e33253693bb8e571.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
Alexander L. Cheney (SBN 302157) 
acheney@willkie.com 
333 Bush Street 
San Francisco, CA 94104 
(415) 858-7400 
 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac vice) 
slombardi@willkie.com 
787 7th Avenue 
New York, NY 10019 
(212) 728-8000 
 
Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
jlevy@willkie.com 
1875 K Street, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20006-1238 
(202) 303-1000 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner 
Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC,
Petitioner, 
v. 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS 
LLC, 
Respondent. 
Case No. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
Judge Martínez-Olguín 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 43     Filed 08/20/24     Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO
 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f), Petitioner Oto Analytics, LLC (f/k/a Oto Analytics, 
Inc., d/b/a Womply) (“Womply”) respectfully submits this Administrative Motion To Consider 
Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed (“Administrative Motion”) in connection with 
its Notice of Motion and Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award And For Entry of Judgment 
(“Motion”). 
Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) provides that “[f]or any document a party (‘Filing Party’) seeks to 
seal because that document has been designated as confidential by another party or non-party, (the 
‘Designating Party’), the Filing Party must . . . file an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 
Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed,” so that “the Designating Party [can] file a statement 
and/or declaration” justifying any sealing or redaction.  In accordance with Civil Local 
Rule 79-5(f), Petitioner submits this Administrative Motion because its Motion and accompanying 
Declaration of Alexander L. Cheney (“Cheney Declaration”) and exhibits contain certain 
information that Respondent Benworth Capital Partners LLP (“Benworth”) has claimed or may 
claim is confidential.  Benworth has the burden to justify its claims of confidentiality and to 
establish that the designated information is sealable.  Civ. L.R. 79-5(f)(3) & (c)(1).  In the interim, 
Womply is provisionally submitting the following information under seal: 
 
Docket No. 
Document 
Page/Line Nos. 
41 
Notice of Motion and Motion to Confirm 
Arbitration Award And For Entry of Judgment 
Page 8, Line(s) 13–17 
41-2 
Cheney Declaration  
Page 2, Line(s) 19–24 
41-5 
Exhibit 3 to the Cheney Declaration, Corrected 
Final Award, dated June 26, 2024 
Portions of pages 16–17, 24, 
25–29, 37–39, 44–45, 50–51, 
53 
41-9 
Exhibit 7 to the Cheney Declaration, Arbitration 
Order, dated January 17, 2023 
Portions of pages 2–4 
41-10 
Exhibit 8 to the Cheney Declaration, Arbitration 
Order, dated January 31, 2023 
Portions of page 1–2 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 43     Filed 08/20/24     Page 2 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO
 
WHEREFORE, Womply respectfully submits this Administrative Motion pursuant to Civil 
Local Rule 79-5, and hereby notifies Benworth of its burden to establish that the designated material 
is sealable if Benworth seeks to have the material sealed.  In accordance with Civil Local 
Rule 79-5(e), unredacted versions of these documents accompany this Administrative Motion. 
 
Date: August 20, 2024 
 
 
 
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP 
 
 
 
 
 
By:  /s/ Alexander L. Cheney 
 
Alexander L. Cheney 
Stuart R. Lombardi (admitted pro hac 
vice) 
         Joshua S. Levy (admitted pro hac vice) 
 
Attorneys for Petitioner  
Oto Analytics, LLC
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 43     Filed 08/20/24     Page 3 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S 
MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
CASE NO. 3:24-CV-03975-AMO
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on August 20, 2024, I served a copy of Petitioner’s Administrative 
Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed; a [Proposed] Order 
Granting Petitioner’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should 
be Sealed; Petitioner’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award And For Entry 
of Judgment; Exhibit 3 to the Cheney Declaration; Exhibit 7 to the Cheney Declaration; and Exhibit 
8 to the Cheney Declaration, by transmitting via e-mail or electronic transmission the foregoing 
documents to the persons at the e-mail addresses set forth below: 
GIRARD SHARP LLP  
 
Daniel C. Girard (State Bar No. 114826) 
Simon S. Grille (State Bar No. 294914) 
601 California Street, Suite 1400  
San Francisco, CA 94108  
Telephone: (415) 981-4800  
dgirard@girardsharp.com 
sgrille@girardsharp.com  
 
KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON  
 
Jorge L. Piedra (admitted pro hac vice) 
Dwayne A. Robinson (admitted pro hac vice) 
Michael R. Lorigas (admitted pro hac vice) 
2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, 9th Floor  
Miami, Florida 33134  
Telephone: (305) 372-1800 
jpiedra@kttlaw.com  
drobinson@kttlaw.com  
mlorigas@kttlaw.com  
 
Dated: August 20, 2024  
 
 
 
 
By: /s/ Alexander L. Cheney _______ 
Attorney for Petitioner Oto Analytics, LLC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-03975-AMO     Document 43     Filed 08/20/24     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.431982.43.0.pdf
Size: 377,734 bytes
SHA-256: 3e32e3d841981540f9d43e581f36f5f643f59286036b0b63e33253693bb8e571
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.431982.43.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)