Case docket
Sport & Wheat, CPA, PA v. ServisFirst Bank, Inc. — court filings
Sport & Wheat CPA PA v. ServisFirst Bank, Inc. — 6 court filings in the archive, mostly from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, filed between April 26, 2020 and September 4, 2020. Among them: 3 orders, 1 motion and 1 complaint.
Case facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division (3 filings); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (3 filings) |
|---|---|
| Filings | 6 public filings |
| Filed | 2020-04-26 – 2020-09-04 |
| Document types | orders (3), motion (1), complaint (1) |
| Original PDFs | 6 of 6 |
Case summary
Sport & Wheat, CPA, PA, a small accounting firm, brought this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, Case No. 3:20cv5425-TKW-HTC, against ServisFirst Bank, Inc., Synovus, The First, Truist and John Doe lenders. It alleged that the lenders did not pay it the agent fees, totalling $4,526, that it says it was due under the Paycheck Protection Program and its implementing regulation for helping borrowers obtain loans. The order of August 17, 2020 dismissed the amended complaint's four counts, holding that the lenders had no legal obligation to pay an agent fee where neither the firm nor the borrowers executed SBA Form 159 or had agreements with the lenders. On September 4, 2020 the court denied leave to amend as futile and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Case at a glance
| Parties | Plaintiff Sport & Wheat, CPA, PA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated businesses and individuals; defendants ServisFirst Bank, Inc., Synovus, The First, Truist and John Doe lenders |
|---|---|
| Court and docket | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, Case No. 3:20cv5425-TKW-HTC, Judge T. Kent Wetherell, II |
| Program | Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), and the agent fee provisions of the CARES Act and the interim final rule |
| Claims | Count 1, unjust enrichment; count 2, contract implied in law; count 3, conversion; count 4, declaratory relief that the lenders violated federal law by not paying the plaintiff its portion of the loan processing fee, with injunctive relief |
| Disposition or status | Amended complaint dismissed August 17, 2020; leave to file a second amended complaint denied as futile and the case dismissed with prejudice on September 4, 2020 |
| Status checked | 2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read |
What did the court decide?
That the central issue of first impression, whether the plaintiff and others like it are entitled to any portion of the fees the federal government paid to lenders under the Paycheck Protection Program, has the short answer no, and it dismissed all four counts of the amended complaint.
Why were the claims dismissed?
Because it was undisputed that neither the plaintiff nor the borrowers executed Form 159 or had agreements with the defendants about payment, so the defendants had no legal obligation under the CARES Act or the interim final rule to pay an agent fee, and because the benefit the plaintiff conferred on the lenders was indirect and incidental, which does not satisfy the first element of unjust enrichment or contract implied in law.
How does the order describe the wider litigation?
As apparently the first of at least 50 cases then pending around the country raising the same issue, noting that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation had denied a motion to transfer those cases into a single MDL proceeding, In re Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Agent Fees Litigation, MDL No. 2950, on August 5, 2020.
Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.
Filings
6 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.
- Verified Emergency Class Action Complaint — Sport & Wheat CPA…PDF
- Motion to Dismiss and Supporting Memorandum — Sport & Wheat v. ServisFirst (N.D. Fla.)Motion · PDF
- Order on Motion to Seal — Sport & Wheat CPA v. ServisFirst Bank (N.D. Fla. 2020) (N.D. Fla.)Order · PDF
- Order Dismissing Amended Complaint — Sport & Wheat v. ServisFirstOrder · PDF
- Second Amended Class Action Complaint — Sport & Wheat v…Complaint · PDF
- Order Denying Leave to Amend and Dismissing with Prejudice — Sport & Wheat v. ServisFirst (N.D. Fla.)Order · PDF
Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.