Court filing

Order Denying Leave to Amend and Dismissing with Prejudice — Sport & Wheat v. ServisFirst (N.D. Fla.)

Summary

Sport & Wheat, CPA, PA's motion for leave to amend the complaint (Doc. 89) is DENIED as futile and the case against ServisFirst Bank, Inc., et al. is DISMISSED with prejudice, the Clerk to close the file, under an Order Denying Leave to Amend and Dismissing Case with Prejudice in Case No. 3:20cv5425-TKW-HTC, Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, after consideration of the defendants' responses in opposition (Documents 91 and 92) and the proposed second amended complaint (Doc. 90). The order is signed T. Kent Wetherell, II, United States District Judge, this 4th day of September, 2020, and is Document 93 in Case 3:20-cv-05425-TKW-HTC, filed 09/04/20.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 4, 2020 in Sport Wheat v. Servisfirst; one of 133 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Filed	2020-09-04

Cite this document

“Order Denying Leave to Amend and Dismissing with Prejudice — Sport & Wheat v. ServisFirst (N.D. Fla.).” UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, No. 3:20-cv-05425-TKW-HTC, Doc. 93, filed 2020-09-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/sport-wheat-v-servisfirst/2020-09-04-order-denying-leave-to-amend/, SHA-256 bd358efaefbc148c555f5c49a9a8c385390b2685b405efd601233776ec566d92.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Cited in: The Agents Got Nothing · ServisFirst Bank · Synovus Bank

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
PENSACOLA DIVISION 
 
SPORT & WHEAT, CPA, PA, 
 
 
Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Case No. 3:20cv5425-TKW-HTC 
 
SERVISFIRST BANK, INC., et al., 
 
 
Defendants. 
______________________________/ 
 
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND 
AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 
 
 
This case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the 
complaint (Doc. 89) and Defendants’ responses in opposition (Docs. 91, 92).  Upon 
due consideration of these filings and the proposed second amended complaint (Doc. 
90), the Court finds that the motion to amend is due to be denied because the 
proposed amendment would be futile.  Accordingly, it is 
 
ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend the complaint is DENIED, 
this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk shall close the file. 
 
DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2020. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 T. Kent Wetherell, II                          
 
 
 
T. KENT WETHERELL, II 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
Case 3:20-cv-05425-TKW-HTC     Document 93     Filed 09/04/20     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.flnd.190491.93.0.pdf
Size: 75,069 bytes
SHA-256: bd358efaefbc148c555f5c49a9a8c385390b2685b405efd601233776ec566d92
Our copy: gov.uscourts.flnd.190491.93.0.pdf
Original: storage.courtlistener.com