Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Agent Fee Litigation Exhibit C - Adams deposition — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 90.3)

Court filing

Exhibit C - Adams deposition — Agent Fee Litigation (Dkt. 90.3)

Summary

Selected pages from the deposition of Adams taken June 18, 2020 in Sport & Wheat CPA PA v. ServisFirst Bank Inc, Synovus Bank, et al., Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-5425, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division, filed as Exhibit C. The pages include the caption, appearances of counsel for the plaintiffs and for Synovus Bank, Truist Bank and ServisFirst, and an exhibit index listing Exhibits E4, L1, L2, L3 and S1. Questioned by plaintiffs' counsel William F. Cash, III, the witness describes the volume of PPP applications at the bank, the staff pulled from other roles to process them, and how the bank identified application information that did not match its systems. The transcript closes with questions about text messages concerning an application.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                         Steve Adams

 1       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 2            NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
 3                  PENSACOLA DIVISION
 4    SPORT & WHEAT CPA PA,      )
 5    a Florida corporation,     )
 6    individually and on        )
 7    behalf of a class of       )
 8    similarly situated         )
 9    businesses and             )
10    individuals,               )
11               Plaintiffs,     ) CIVIL ACTION NO:
12    VS.                        ) 3:20-CV-5425
13    SERVISFIRST BANK INC;      )
14    SYNOVUS BANK; et al.,      )
15               Defendants.     )
16

17             Deposition of Steve Adams
18                    June 18, 2020
19                       9:30 a.m.
20      At the offices of Butler Wooten & Peak
21                   105 13th Street
22              Columbus, Georgia 31901
23    Court Reporter: Karen Hinch
24

25

Golkow Litigation Services                            Page 1
                         Steve Adams

 1               A P P E A R A N C E S
 2

 3    ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS:
 4       William F. Cash, III (Via Zoom)
 5       Levin, Papantonio, Thomas,
 6            Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, P.A.
 7       316 South Baylen Street, Suite 600
 8       Pensacola, FL 32502
 9       bcash@levinlaw.com
10

11       John S. Wirt (Via Zoom)
12       Wirt & Wirt, P.A.
13       5 Calhoun Avenue, Suite 306
14       Destin, FL 32541
15       jwirt@wirtlawfirm.com
16    ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT, SYNOVUS BANK:
17       Philip A. Bates
18       Philip A. Bates, P.A.
19       25 West Cedar Street, Suite 550
20       Pensacola, FL 32502
21       pbates@philipbates.net
22

23

24

25

Golkow Litigation Services                         Page 2
                         Steve Adams

 1       Ramsey B. Prather
 2       James E. Butler, Jr.
 3       Butler Wooten & Peak, LLP
 4       105 13th Street
 5       Columbus, GA 31901
 6       ramsey@butlerwooten.com
 7       james@butlerwooten.com
 8

 9       Antonio M. Haynes (Via Zoom)
10       Paul J. Nathanson (Via Zoom)
11       Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP
12       450 Lexington Avenue
13       New York, NY
14       antonio.haynes@davispolk.com
15       paul.nathanson@davispolk.com
16

17    ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT, TRUIST BANK:
18       Cheryl L. Haas (Via Zoom)
19       McGuire Woods
20       1230 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2100
21       Atlanta, GA 30309
22       chaas@mcguirewoods.com
23

24

25

Golkow Litigation Services                         Page 3
                         Steve Adams

 1    ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT, SERVISFIRST:
 2       Sara Anne Ford (Via Zoom)
 3       Lightfoot Franklin & White
 4       400 20th Street North
 5       Birmingham, Alabama 35203
 6       sford@lightfootlaw.com
 7

 8    ALSO APPEARING:
 9       Jill Sport (Via Zoom)
10       Tim Wheat (Via Zoom)
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Golkow Litigation Services                       Page 4
                         Steve Adams

 1                           I N D E X
 2                                             Page:
 3    Examination by Mr. Cash                    6
 4

 5

 6

 7                     EXHIBIT INDEX
 8                                           Marked:
 9    Exhibit E4     May 25, 2020 email         43
10    Exhibit L1     Email (Weaver and Barton) 110
11    Exhibit L2     Text messages             116
12    Exhibit L3     Federal Register 4-15-2020 83
13    Exhibit S1     Screenshot                136
14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Golkow Litigation Services                           Page 5
                          Steve Adams

 1                           was marked
 2                  for identification.)
 3    Q           Okay.      So I just wanted to
 4    introduce Exhibit E4, which you see -- which
 5    you have there on the computer in front of
 6    you.    So I'm just showing you that this is
 7    an email chain.        The second page here is
 8    from Rick McClanahan, vice president,
 9    Pensacola, Florida.
10                Do you see that?
11    A           I do.
12    Q           Okay.      Do you recognize him?
13    A           I don't know Rick.
14    Q           Okay.      All right.   It says here
15    it's known as the number one most reputable
16    bank.    And it's addressed to borrowers, as
17    far as I can tell.        Mr. McClanahan is
18    saying, "I want to thank each of you for
19    your patience as we chartered these new
20    waters together.        The first round of the PPP
21    was stressful for all of us."
22                Would you agree with that
23    statement?
24    A           I think it would -- many people
25    would say that it was stressful given the
Golkow Litigation Services                               Page 44
                         Steve Adams

 1    urgency and short timing.
 2    Q          He goes on and he says, "I know
 3    many of you were losing sleep because we
 4    were talking on the phone at 11:00 and 12:00
 5    at night either getting your application
 6    ready or discussing the mechanics of these
 7    funds."
 8               Do you see that?
 9    A          I do see that.
10    Q          Okay.       So when you said the bank
11    was busy, this is the type of activity that
12    you were talking about?
13    A          Yes.    It's -- yes.
14    Q          Okay.       I mean, it looks like to
15    me the bank was totally crushed with
16    applications; is that fair?
17               MR. BATES:       Object to the form of
18    the question.
19    A          I'm not sure what you mean by
20    "totally crushed."
21    Q          Well, would you say the bank was
22    extremely overloaded with these applications
23    in this short period of time that you
24    mentioned?
25               MR. BATES:       Object again.
Golkow Litigation Services                              Page 45
                         Steve Adams

 1    A          Yeah.       Again, when you say
 2    "overloaded," I'm not -- there were a lot --
 3    there were a lot of applications, but that's
 4    a relative term, and it certainly didn't
 5    overload our systems.        But there's a time
 6    component so there's a significant desire to
 7    serve as many customers as possible, and
 8    there was uncertainty around the timing that
 9    funds would be available so our bankers
10    moved with urgency.        And unknowns can create
11    tension and stress.
12    Q          I mean, you're familiar with the
13    fact that the CARES Act money in run one
14    completely ran out across the country,
15    right?
16    A          Yes.
17    Q          And wasn't it true that there was
18    a general impetus in the banking industry to
19    get loan applications through fast so the
20    customers could get funded before that pool
21    of money ran out?
22    A          That's fair, yes.
23    Q          He says here in this email,
24    "We're still processing PPP applications as
25    they trickle in.        We would consider this
Golkow Litigation Services                              Page 46
                         Steve Adams

 1    Q          Their relationship manager, you
 2    said?
 3    A          Yes.
 4    Q          And would that be a person that
 5    sits in a retail branch?
 6    A          Not necessarily, no.
 7    Q          Okay.       Where else would they be?
 8    A          They might be in a commercial
 9    banking office.
10    Q          Okay.       Do you know about how many
11    people at the bank worked on the loans --
12    worked on the application process bringing
13    these loans in and trying to validate and
14    process them?
15    A          I would need to clarify.       Do you
16    mean any -- we had multiple work cues,
17    different groups that had a different
18    responsibility to include the development of
19    the portal from a technology perspective all
20    the way through closing and funding and
21    communication.     So do you mean directly
22    reviewing applications at some stage of
23    work?
24    Q          I see what you're saying.       Maybe
25    you can break it down for me.        I'm primarily
Golkow Litigation Services                           Page 49
                          Steve Adams

 1    interested in those who would have had
 2    interaction with borrowers.
 3    A          Yes.    I would say around 400
 4    people -- and this is an estimate -- that
 5    would have had some likelihood of having an
 6    opportunity to interact with a client, but
 7    the need to interact with a client might
 8    vary.
 9    Q          Did you have people working
10    overtime in this capacity?
11    A          A few.      Many team members are
12    exempt and would not have necessarily had
13    hourly tracking.
14    Q          When you say "a few," who had
15    overtime and for what roles are we talking
16    about?
17               MR. BATES:      Object to the form.
18               If you understand the question,
19    go ahead and answer.
20    A          The specific roles, it could have
21    been in a few different stages of the
22    process.   We had a group that reviewed the
23    online portal submissions and would have,
24    you know, made sure that the information was
25    accurate and matched it to a customer on our
Golkow Litigation Services                             Page 50
                          Steve Adams

 1                MR. BATES:      It's probably yours.
 2                MR. CASH:      Yeah, it probably is.
 3    Q           (By Mr. Cash) So I'm asking --
 4    you said that you had other people that were
 5    pulled in from other roles to help in this
 6    generic processor role for PPP.        So what
 7    kinds of people were pulled in?
 8    A           We used -- to be honest, it was
 9    broad.   We utilized commercial bankers.         We
10    utilized portfolio managers and, in some
11    cases, underwriters.        We had branch managers
12    in a limited capacity in some cases who were
13    involved.    We utilized our commercial
14    assistants for part of the process.        Of
15    course our SBA team, in addition to their
16    day job of processing traditional 7(a)
17    loans, would have been involved in
18    processing these loans as well and
19    supporting that.
20    Q           Okay.      So just so I'm clear, the
21    workload on the bank was so heavy that you
22    pulled people out of their regular jobs to
23    step in and serve as PPP processors because
24    there was that much work to do?
25                MR. BATES:      Object to the form.
Golkow Litigation Services                              Page 52
                         Steve Adams

 1    A          Yes.
 2    Q          If you had exceptions or errors
 3    or questions on an application, was there a
 4    code or a flag on the application that was
 5    placed or triggered by anybody?
 6    A          I don't know if I would call it a
 7    code or a flag, but we had a way to identify
 8    loans not around eligibility, per se, but
 9    around is the information from this
10    applicant, does it match our system, can we
11    identify that they are a Synovus customer.
12    Q          Would the bank benefit from an
13    application that is clean and doesn't have
14    errors on it compared with an application
15    that's going to require the bank to go back
16    and reconcile issues with the borrower?
17    A          Can you ask that question again?
18    Q          Yeah, sure.    Would the bank
19    benefit from receiving a clean application
20    that is properly eligible, has the correct
21    calculations, and is supported with all the
22    right documents versus receiving an
23    application that might not be eligible,
24    might have bad calculations, might be
25    missing necessary supporting documents?
Golkow Litigation Services                         Page 61
                          Steve Adams

 1    A           We would be able to process that
 2    application more quickly.
 3    Q           Okay.      Wouldn't that mean then
 4    there would be more time to process another
 5    application for a different client?
 6                MR. BATES:      Object to the form.
 7    A           It may mean that.      There are
 8    certainly other considerations as well
 9    around availability of funds and that sort
10    of thing that are unknown.        But it would
11    make easier -- the processing is easier if
12    all the documentation is there the first
13    time.
14    Q           Okay.      And I guess that's what
15    I'm getting at.        So that would mean that you
16    would have freed up some labor resources to
17    work on a different application which would
18    allow the bank to do more business if
19    applications coming in are correct; is that
20    not true?
21                MR. BATES:      Object to the form.
22                Answer if you can.
23    A           Yes.
24    Q           I'm going to ask a little bit
25    about your systems.        I'm switching gears a
Golkow Litigation Services                              Page 62
                          Steve Adams

 1    and document request.
 2                Page 7 Ms. Sport is talking about
 3    we don't have forecasted monthly expenses
 4    for two months.        They're asking what
 5    utilities are.      Ms. Weaver writes back,
 6    "Hell fire and damnation.         I don't know,"
 7    talking about the application.
 8                Ms. Weaver says, "Let's go to a
 9    spa I know in San Antonio after this is
10    over."
11                Do these texts support that
12    Ms. Sport was helping put an application to
13    the bank?    Wouldn't this support that the
14    bank knew Ms. Sport was trying to make an
15    application?
16    A           It would indicate that this
17    Ms. Sport is, you know, doing something in
18    the process, you know, submitting
19    information it appears on behalf of the
20    customer.
21    Q           Okay.      Now, you said you have not
22    seen these before.        And is Ms. Weaver
23    violating the policy you said about not
24    texting customers?
25    A           She would be.
Golkow Litigation Services                           Page 122


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flnd.190491.90.3.pdf
Size
23,418 bytes
SHA-256
5a4f24ba76db44130fc2d3ec96e0b1241002089910c23d7ae116ea8189a25ae1
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flnd.190491.90.3.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top