Ex. F — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 150-6, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Summary

Exhibit F, Document 150-6, filed March 13, 2025 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC, No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It is an email sent Tuesday, July 30, 2024 by Lawrence J. Lederer to Edward Rogers, giving an update on three items. The email says plaintiffs withdraw deposition notices for Ms. Nunez and Mr. Castillo without prejudice to rescheduling, intend to proceed with the deposition of Mr. Martinez 8/21 as noticed, and propose dismissing Ms. Drevnak as a class representative plaintiff, with prejudice if Prestamos agrees not to pursue repayment of her $1,250 loan. It also states that plaintiffs agree to filing the attached draft stipulation emailed 7/23/24.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

EXHIBIT F 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-6     Filed 03/13/25     Page 1 of 2

1
Burruss, Chesley
From:
Lawrence J. Lederer <llederer@baileyglasser.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, July 30, 2024 4:38 PM
To:
Rogers, Edward
Cc:
Bart D. Cohen; Michael L. Murphy; jheller@nhkllp.com; Matthew Zapala; Pratt, Marcel S.; 
Burruss, Chesley; Longley, Henry; roy@ha-firm.com; daniel@ha-firm.com; Gallagher, 
Thomas J.; jillian@ha-firm.com; AUSTIN@ha-firm.com; beatriz@ha-firm.com; Joseph 
Martin; gzini@nhkllp.com; Gabriel R. Dos Santos; DiMezza, Gianni V.; Watson, Travis W.
Subject:
RE: Alicia Marshall, et al. v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC and Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., C.A. No.
5:21-cv-04337-JMG (E.D. Pa.)
Attachments:
Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Beattie Dervin Holland Innis Pronsky and Stalnaker 
DMFIRM_413025893(5).DOCX
⚠ EXTERNAL 
Ed: 
 
This updates you folks as to three items. 
 
First, plaintiffs withdraw the deposition notices issued for the Phase I depositions of Ms. Nunez and Mr. Castillo without 
prejudice to rescheduling these witnesses as part of Phase II discovery. Plaintiffs intend to proceed with the deposition of 
Mr. Martinez 8/21 as noticed and scheduled. 
 
Second, given the recent evidence indicating that Prestamos funded Ms. Drevnak’s $1,250 loan and despite Ms. 
Drevnak’s testimony yesterday that she instructed her bank to return those proceeds to Prestamos, plaintiffs also propose 
dismissing Ms. Drevnak as a class representative plaintiff. Plaintiffs propose doing so with prejudice if Prestamos agrees 
to not pursue repayment of that loan or interest from Ms. Drevnak or impair her credit rating regarding it. 
 
Third, plaintiffs agree to the filing of the attached draft stipulation you emailed 7/23/24. Assuming the parties agree 
regarding Ms. Drevnak per above, we can add her to that stipulation or submit another one. We favor the former, which 
would require just the addition of a couple paras. 
 
Please advise. 
 
Thank you. 
 
Larry  
 
 
___________________________ 
Lawrence J. Lederer 
Partner 
Bailey & Glasser, LLP 
T: 202.548.7787
From: Rogers, Edward <RogersE@ballardspahr.com>  
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 2:31 PM 
To: Lawrence J. Lederer <llederer@baileyglasser.com> 
Cc: Bart D. Cohen <bcohen@baileyglasser.com>; Michael L. Murphy <MMurphy@baileyglasser.com>; 
jheller@nhkllp.com; Matthew Zapala <mzapala@nhkllp.com>; Pratt, Marcel S. <PrattM@ballardspahr.com>; Burruss, 
Chesley <burrussc@ballardspahr.com>; Longley, Henry <longleyh@ballardspahr.com>; roy@ha-firm.com; daniel@ha-
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-6     Filed 03/13/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.6.pdf

Size

979,639 bytes

SHA-256

9dae1b3284a6e50ac33d3d3f80f7942868c5bd7a1bdedc14e55adae5a0023e27

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.6.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)