Ex. A — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 150-1, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Summary

Exhibit A, Document 150-1, filed March 13, 2025 in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC, No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. It is an email sent Tuesday, March 4, 2025 by Lawrence J. Lederer on behalf of plaintiffs, following that day's status conference with the Court. The email proposes that plaintiffs forgo three of the four 30(b)(1) depositions noticed, of Nunez, Adame and Castillo, if Prestamos agrees to timely produce Martinez for deposition on or prior to the April 9, 2025 discovery deadline. It also asks Prestamos to provide timely answers and substantive responses to plaintiffs' RFAs rather than just objections.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

EXHIBIT A 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-1     Filed 03/13/25     Page 1 of 2

1
Burruss, Chesley
From:
Lawrence J. Lederer <llederer@baileyglasser.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, March 4, 2025 2:54 PM
To:
Pratt, Marcel S.; Rogers, Edward; Longley, Henry; Burruss, Chesley; Gallagher, Thomas J.; 
Daniel Arellano; Roy Herrera; jillian@ha-firm.com
Cc:
Bart D. Cohen; Michael L. Murphy; Heller, Justin A.; Zapala, Matthew M.; Gabriel R. Dos 
Santos
Subject:
RE: Prestamos - Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition
⚠ EXTERNAL 
Marcel and team:  
 
I write on behalf of plaintiffs following today’s status conference with the Court. Plaintiffs are willing to forgo three of the 
four Rule 30(b)(1) depositions plaintiffs noticed last week – specifically, Nunez, Adame and Castillo – if Prestamos 
agrees to timely produce Martinez for deposition on or prior to the April 9, 2025 discovery deadline. This assumes 
Martinez would also be Prestamos’ Rule 30(b)(6) designee as to at least two of the five specific Rule 30(b)(6) topics 
plaintiffs noticed – including specifically topic one as to Prestamos’ use of the Loan Documents, and topic five as to 
Prestamos’ policies and procedures regarding PPP lending. In addition, please advise us whether Martinez would also be 
Prestamos’ Rule 30(b)(6) designee as to the three other Rule 30(b)(6) topics, as to which we reserve our rights. Further, as 
part of this proposal to narrow the pending discovery, plaintiffs would also a) agree to depose Martinez once as both a 
30(b)(1) witness and Prestamos’ 30(b)(6) witness, and b) expect Prestamos to provide timely answers and substantive 
responses to plaintiffs’ RFAs rather than just objections.  
 
Happy to further discuss if and as you want. Either way, please promptly advise as to defendant’s position.  
 
Thank you. 
 
Larry  
 
 
_________________________________________ 
Lawrence J. Lederer
Partner
Tel:  
202.548.7787 
Cell:  
267.977.0898 
Fax:  
304.342.1110 
Email:  
llederer@baileyglasser.com  
Office: 
 
1055 Thomas Jefferson Street NW, Suite 540
Washington, D.C. 20007
Connect: 
BaileyGlasser.com | Firm Biography
Disclaimer: This message and any attached documents contain information from the law firm of Bailey & Glasser, LLP that 
may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-1     Filed 03/13/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.1.pdf

Size

1,012,065 bytes

SHA-256

6da116fd18e510e62ea71f05ea3cfa4668311b84731b1745f75d609ef57057ce

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.1.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)