Ex. B — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 150-2, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG · Doc. 150-2 · 2025-03-13 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

EXHIBIT B 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-2     Filed 03/13/25     Page 1 of 2

1
Burruss, Chesley
From:
Lawrence J. Lederer <llederer@baileyglasser.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 9:56 AM
To:
Pratt, Marcel S.
Cc:
Rogers, Edward; Burruss, Chesley; Gallagher, Thomas J.; Daniel Arellano; Roy Herrera; 
jillian@ha-firm.com; Bart D. Cohen; Michael L. Murphy; Justin A. Heller; Matthew M. 
Zapala; Gabriel R. Dos Santos; Beatriz Aguirre
Subject:
RE: Prestamos - Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition
⚠ EXTERNAL 
Marcel and team: 
 
Good morning. As part of our proposal to substantially narrow the pending discovery, Plaintiffs also seek to depose Mr. 
Castillo under Rule 30(b)(1). We understand that we also originally proposed forgoing his deposition.  But that was 
subject to who Prestamos designates as its Rule 30(b(6) witness(es), and Prestamos still hasn't identified its Rule 30(b(6) 
designee(s) for any of the five specific topics set forth in Plaintiffs' Rule 30(b)(6) notice. To the extent that Castillo is 
Prestamos' 30(b)(6) designee for any of those five topics, Plaintiffs would also be willing to depose Castillo once not 
twice as with Martinez unless Prestamos wants the Rule 30(b)(1) and (b)(6) depositions separate.  
 
Plaintiffs will also forgo the 30(b)(1) depositions of Nunez and Adame in full, again subject also to Prestamos also 
answering Plainitffs' pending RFAs. Further, Plaintiffs are also amenable to limiting the time of both the Martinez and 
Castillo depositions to a maximum of up to three or four hours depending on whether they are also Prestamos' Rule 
30(b)(6) designees.   
 
Please advise. Again, if Prestamos fails to agree to produce Martinez and Castillo for deposition and identify its Rule 
30(b)(6) designee(s) -- who Plaintiffs continue to believe are indeed Martinez and Castillo anyway -- we will be forced to 
promptly seek Judge Gallagher's intervention. If you want to discuss any aspect of this, we can do that too. 
 
Thank you. 
 
Larry  
 
 
___________________________ 
Lawrence J. Lederer 
Partner 
Bailey & Glasser, LLP 
T: 202.548.7787
From: Lawrence J. Lederer <llederer@baileyglasser.com>  
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 5:41 PM 
To: Marcel S. Pratt <PrattM@ballardspahr.com> 
Cc: Edward Rogers <RogersE@ballardspahr.com>; Chesley Burruss <burrussc@ballardspahr.com>; Thomas J. Gallagher 
<GallagherT@ballardspahr.com>; Daniel Arellano <daniel@ha-firm.com>; Roy Herrera <roy@ha-firm.com>; jillian@ha-
firm.com; Bart D. Cohen <bcohen@baileyglasser.com>; Michael L. Murphy <MMurphy@baileyglasser.com>; Justin A. 
Heller <jheller@woh.com>; Matthew M. Zapala <mzapala@woh.com>; Gabriel R. Dos Santos 
<gdossantos@baileyglasser.com>; Beatriz Aguirre <beatriz@ha-firm.com> 
Subject: Re: Prestamos - Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition 
 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-2     Filed 03/13/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.2.pdf

Size

949,347 bytes

SHA-256

548664c6e71ec6cbe4d85df568263055e6f5c9d539646b5abca11411881a40c9

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)