Ex. C — Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC (Dkt. 150-3, E.D. Pa. No. 5:21-cv-04337)

Summary

Exhibit C (Doc. 150-3) in Marshall v. Prestamos CDFI, LLC, No. 5:21-cv-04337-JMG, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, filed March 13, 2025. It is an email from Marcel S. Pratt to Lawrence J. Lederer sent Tuesday, March 11, 2025, with the subject line referring to Plaintiffs' notice of deposition. The email states that Prestamos will agree to produce Jose Martinez on a single date as a witness, subject to its objections, and is not agreeing to produce David Castillo as a witness. It also says Pratt is willing to meet and confer that week.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

EXHIBIT C 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-3     Filed 03/13/25     Page 1 of 2

1
Burruss, Chesley
From:
Pratt, Marcel S.
Sent:
Tuesday, March 11, 2025 5:30 PM
To:
Lawrence J. Lederer
Cc:
Rogers, Edward; Burruss, Chesley; Gallagher, Thomas J.; Daniel Arellano; Roy Herrera; 
jillian@ha-firm.com; Bart D. Cohen; Michael L. Murphy; Justin A. Heller; Matthew M. 
Zapala; Gabriel R. Dos Santos; Beatriz Aguirre; Watson, Travis W.
Subject:
RE: Prestamos - Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition
Attachments:
2025.03.11 Responses and Objections to Rule 30(b)(6) Notice 4900-8285-2901.pdf
Larry: 
 
In response to your most recent and earlier emails: 
 
1. Attached please find Prestamos’s objections to Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) notice (the “Objections”). 
 
2. After discussing your initial proposal with our client, Prestamos will agree to produce Jose Martinez on a single 
date to testify as a Rule 30(b)(1) and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, subject to the Objections.   We will work on providing 
dates for a virtual deposition. 
 
3. Prestamos is not agreeing to produce David Castillo as a witness, in any capacity.  You made a proposal that 
explicitly waived a deposition of Mr. Castillo, and gave us a unilateral deadline of March 12 (tomorrow) to 
respond to that proposal.  Rather than give us the opportunity to meet your deadline, you revoked the proposal 
and have now asked for Mr. Castillo’s deposition on the ground that we have not responded to your 30(b)(6) 
topics.  With this email, we are responding to your topics and offering to produce Mr. Martinez to testify to all of 
them, as stated above.  Accordingly, we assume you will withdraw your request for Mr. Castillo’s deposition and 
if you do not do so, we will regard your latest proposal as not being made in good faith. 
 
4. We are willing to meet and confer this week. 
 
 
 
Best, 
Marcel  
 
 
Marcel S. Pratt 
He/Him/His  
 
  
 
  
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor 
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599 
215.864.8506 DIRECT 
215.864.8999 FAX  
   
 
prattm@ballardspahr.com 
VCARD 
www.ballardspahr.com  
  
 
Case 5:21-cv-04337-JMG     Document 150-3     Filed 03/13/25     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.3.pdf

Size

832,453 bytes

SHA-256

7959e08d45484198e3274ed922e7aa38c12875461049190d5e3c92dc35fc11d4

Our copy

gov.uscourts.paed.589575.150.3.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)