STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 28 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 29)

Record facts

Summary

A joint stipulation and proposed order setting a motion to dismiss briefing schedule in Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, dated April 8, 2021. The stipulation recites that the plaintiffs filed a class action complaint alleging Thomson Reuters collected and sold Californians' data through its CLEAR database, and that the defendant filed a motion to dismiss and motion to strike on April 5, 2021. The parties agree that the opposition is due May 12, 2021, the reply is due May 27, 2021, and the motions will be heard on June 24, 2021. The proposed order for United States District Judge Edward M. Chen grants the stipulation and sets the hearing at 1:30 p.m. The filing includes counsel signature blocks and a Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) attestation.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658) 
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541) 
Amanda M. Karl (SBN 301088) 
Jeffrey B. Kosbie (SBN 305424) 
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP  
505 14th Street, Suite 1110 
Oakland, California 94612 
(510) 350-9700 (tel.) 
(510) 350-9701 (fax) 
ehg@classlawgroup.com 
amm@classlawgroup.com 
amk@classlawgroup.com 
jbk@classlawgroup.com 
 
  
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 
 
[Additional counsel on signature page] 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, 
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated,  
 
                                    Plaintiffs,  
            v.  
 
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, 
 
                         Defendant. 
 
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC 
JOINT STIPULATION AND 
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING 
MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING 
SCHEDULE  
 
 
 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 
 
  JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
Pursuant to this Court’s General Civil Standing Order ¶ 4, as well as Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3 
and its Commentary, Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz and Defendant Thomson Reuters 
Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint alleging Thomson Reuters, as part of its 
CLEAR database, collected and sold Californians’ data without their consent; 
WHEREAS, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss and motion to strike on April 5, 2021;  
WHEREAS, the motion to dismiss raises complex legal issues concerning privacy in the digital 
sphere; 
WHEREAS, the parties would benefit from longer time periods for response and reply than 
those contemplated by Local Rule 7-3; and 
WHEREAS, in light of the complexity of the motion to dismiss the parties have agreed to an 
alternative briefing schedule; 
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiffs’ opposition brief will be due on May 12, 2021; 
Defendant’s reply brief will be due on May 27, 2021; and the Court will hear the motion to dismiss 
and motion to strike on June 24, 2021, or at a later date set by the Court. 
 
IT IS SO STIPULATED. 
 
Dated: April 8, 2021 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
By: /s/ Andre M. Mura 
 
 
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658) 
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541) 
Amanda M. Karl (SBN 301088) 
Jeffrey B. Kosbie (SBN 305424) 
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP 
505 14th Street, Suite 1110 
Oakland, California 94612 
Telephone: (510) 350-9700  
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701  
ehg@classlawgroup.com 
amm@classlawgroup.com 
amk@classlawgroup.com 
jbk@classlawgroup.com 
 
 
Jennifer D. Bennett (SBN 296726) 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 
 
  JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
Neil K. Sawhney (SBN 300130) 
GUPTA WESSLER PLLC 
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 
San Francisco, CA 94111 
Telephone: (415) 573-0336 
jennifer@guptawessler.com 
neil@gutawessler.com 
 
 
Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice) 
Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice) 
JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC. 
81 Prospect Street, 7th Floor 
Brooklyn, NY 11201 
Telephone: (518) 732-6703 
belga@justicecatalyst.org  
abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org 
 
 
Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice) 
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY 
OVERSIGHT PROJECT 
40 Rector Street, 9th Floor 
New York, NY 10006 
albert@stopspying.org 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and 
Rasheed Shabazz and the Proposed Class 
 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 
 
  JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
DATED:  April 8, 2021 
PERKINS COIE LLP 
By: /s/ Nicola C. Menaldo 
 
Susan D. Fahringer 
Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice  
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice  
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900  
Seattle, WA  98101-3099  
Telephone: (206) 359-8000  
Facsimile:  (206) 359-9000 
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com 
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 
AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com 
Gabriella Gallego 
PERKINS COIE LLP  
3150 Porter Drive  
Palo Alto, CA  94304-1212  
Telephone:  (650) 838-4300  
Facsimile:  (650) 838-4350 
GGallego@perkinscoie.com 
Attorneys for Defendant 
Thomson Reuters Corporation 
 
 
 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4 
 
  JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
ATTESTATION 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document 
has been obtained from the other signatory. 
 
           /s/ Andre M. Mura  
   
Andre M. Mura 
 
 

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5 
 
  JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 
3:21-CV-1418-EMC 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation.  
It is hereby ordered that:  
Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike will be due on May 
12, 2021;  
Defendant’s reply supporting its motion to dismiss and motion to strike will be due on May 27, 
2021; and  
The Court will hear Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike on June 24, 2021, at 
1:30 p.m. 
 
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED: __________________________ 
 
 
__________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EDWARD M. CHEN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.29.0.pdf

Size

145,361 bytes

SHA-256

036d3fba81ffb64e6afe2c87ea0cccc44b98b7768f0da15f2834ad83bdbe33ed

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.29.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)