Court filing
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate,… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 25)
Full text
1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 CAT BROOKS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01418-KAW
Plaintiffs,
8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE
v.
9
10 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
11
12
United States District Court
13 IT IS ORDERED that this case has been reassigned using a proportionate, random and
14 blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to the Honorable Edward M. Chen in the San
15 Francisco division for all further proceedings. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall
Northern District of California
16 bear the initials EMC immediately after the case number.
17 All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing
18 schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge
19 to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior
20 briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also
21 remain unchanged.
22 Dated: March 17, 2021
23
24
Susan Y. Soong
25 Clerk, United States District Court
26
27
28 A true and correct copy of this order has been served by mail upon any pro se parties.
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.25.0.pdf
- Size
- 83,370 bytes
- SHA-256
- a84ea8d04f5526a5c6b58cbef23733c314b8371df4667790b23c0351cb48eafd
- Original
- PACER (login required)