Court filing
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 23)
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-03-17 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 23 · 2021-03-17 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). Case No. CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent or decline to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. OR DECLINE Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be reassigned to a United States district judge. DATE: _______________, 20____ NAME: Signature COUNSEL FOR CAT BROOKS, et al., THOMSON REUTERS CORP. 21-cv-01418-KAW Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 23 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.23.0.pdf
- Size
- 356,434 bytes
- SHA-256
- e9e951972a2c3b7464d3c19429a0d4e0d78e5b0dca1148c1b2f0d83f8a69ad25
- Original
- PACER (login required)