Clerk's Notice to all Parties Re: Consent — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 22, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 22 · 2021-03-03 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
1301 Clay Street 
Oakland, CA 94612 
___________________ 
www.cand.uscourts.gov 
Susan Y. Soong 
 
GENERAL COURT NUMBER 
CLERK OF COURT 
510-637-3530 
March 3, 2021 
 
 
 
 
 
Re:  Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation   
21-cv-01418-KAW 
 
Dear Counsel:  
 
This matter has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kandis A. 
Westmore for all purposes including trial. 
 
The magistrate judges of this district have been designated to conduct any and all proceedings 
in a civil case including a jury or nonjury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment, upon the 
consent of all parties. 
 
A review of our records discloses that the Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge 
Jurisdiction has not been filed in this case.  All parties shall complete the attached form documenting 
either consent or declination and e-file it with the Court by March 17, 2021.   This form can be found 
on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Please note that any party is free to withhold 
consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences.  
 
Susan Y. Soong 
Clerk, United States District Court 
_______________________ 
Doug Merry, Deputy Clerk to  
Magistrate KANDIS A. WESTMORE 
 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 22     Filed 03/03/21     Page 1 of 2

 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
United States District Court 
Northern District of California 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
CAT BROOKS, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
 
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, 
Defendant. 
 
Case No.  21-cv-01418-KAW    
 
 
CONSENT OR DECLINATION  
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
JURISDICTION 
 
 
INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you 
(if you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to 
consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. 
 
(  ) 
 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to 
have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial 
and entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to 
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 
 
 
OR 
 
(  )  
Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction 
 
 
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United 
States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this 
case be reassigned to a United States district judge. 
 
DATE: ________________ 
NAME: 
 
 
COUNSEL FOR  
(OR “PRO SE”):  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 22     Filed 03/03/21     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.22.0.pdf

Size

93,787 bytes

SHA-256

832d99daef7b4bceb71c4a3a87313319d71e3da73c14610ab020c82e9e348ebd

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.22.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)