Court filing
Clerk's Notice to all Parties Re: Consent — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 22, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)
Summary
A Clerk's Notice to all parties dated March 3, 2021, signed for Clerk Susan Y. Soong, in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case 21-cv-01418-KAW (also stamped 3:21-cv-01418-EMC), Document 22, in the Northern District of California. It says the matter was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore for all purposes including trial, that magistrate judges can conduct all proceedings on the consent of all parties, and that the Consent or Declination form had not been filed. All parties must e-file the attached form by March 17, 2021, and any party may withhold consent without adverse consequences. The attached blank form lets each party consent to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 3, 2021 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 443 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-03-03 |
Cite this document
“Clerk's Notice to all Parties Re: Consent — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 22, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 22, filed 2021-03-03. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2021-03-03-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-22-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-22-0/
, SHA-256 832d99daef7b4bceb71c4a3a87313319d71e3da73c14610ab020c82e9e348ebd.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1301 Clay Street Oakland, CA 94612 ___________________ www.cand.uscourts.gov Susan Y. Soong GENERAL COURT NUMBER CLERK OF COURT 510-637-3530 March 3, 2021 Re: Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation 21-cv-01418-KAW Dear Counsel: This matter has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore for all purposes including trial. The magistrate judges of this district have been designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case including a jury or nonjury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment, upon the consent of all parties. A review of our records discloses that the Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction has not been filed in this case. All parties shall complete the attached form documenting either consent or declination and e-file it with the Court by March 17, 2021. This form can be found on the Court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Please note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court _______________________ Doug Merry, Deputy Clerk to Magistrate KANDIS A. WESTMORE Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 22 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CAT BROOKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 21-cv-01418-KAW CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection. ( ) Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. OR ( ) Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be reassigned to a United States district judge. DATE: ________________ NAME: COUNSEL FOR (OR “PRO SE”): Signature Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 22 Filed 03/03/21 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.22.0.pdf
- Size
- 93,787 bytes
- SHA-256
- 832d99daef7b4bceb71c4a3a87313319d71e3da73c14610ab020c82e9e348ebd
- Original
- PACER (login required)