Court filing
ORDER Granting 31 STIPULATION re 28 MOTION to Dismiss Briefing… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 33)
Filed May 7, 2021 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 127 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-05-07 |
Full text
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
Amanda M. Karl (SBN 301088)
Jeffrey B. Kosbie (SBN 305424)
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
ehg@classlawgroup.com
amm@classlawgroup.com
amk@classlawgroup.com
jbk@classlawgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
[Additional counsel on signature page]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
Pursuant to this Court’s General Civil Standing Order ¶ 4, as well as Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3
and its Commentary, Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz and Defendant Thomson Reuters
Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint alleging Thomson Reuters, as part of its
CLEAR database, collected and sold Californians’ data without their consent;
WHEREAS, the motion to dismiss raises complex legal issues concerning privacy in the digital
sphere;
WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated, and the Court ordered, that Plaintiffs’ opposition
brief will be due on May 12, 2021, Defendant’s reply brief will be due on May 27, 2021, and the Court
will hear the motion to dismiss and motion to strike on June 24, 2021 (Dkt. 30);
WHEREAS, since the parties’ prior scheduling stipulation, a key member of Plaintiffs’ counsel
underwent, and is currently recovering from, surgery;
WHEREAS, in light of this development and the complexity of the motion to dismiss, the
parties have agreed to a one-week extension to the briefing schedule; and
WHEREAS, the parties’ proposed schedule change does not impact the motion hearing date,
providing the Court with 15 days between the completion of briefing and the scheduled hearing;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiffs’ opposition brief will be due on May 19, 2021,
and Defendant’s reply brief will be due on June 9, 2021.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 5, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Andre M. Mura
Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
Amanda M. Karl (SBN 301088)
Jeffrey B. Kosbie (SBN 305424)
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
ehg@classlawgroup.com
amm@classlawgroup.com
amk@classlawgroup.com
jbk@classlawgroup.com
Jennifer D. Bennett (SBN 296726)
Neil K. Sawhney (SBN 300130)
GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 573-0336
jennifer@guptawessler.com
neil@gutawessler.com
Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice)
Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice)
JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC.
81 Prospect Street, 7th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Telephone: (518) 732-6703
belga@justicecatalyst.org
abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org
Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice)
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
OVERSIGHT PROJECT
40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10006
albert@stopspying.org
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and
Rasheed Shabazz and the Proposed Class
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
DATED: May 5, 2021
PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer
Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-8000
Facsimile: (206) 359-9000
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
Gabriella Gallego
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: (650) 838-4300
Facsimile: (650) 838-4350
GGallego@perkinscoie.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from the other signatory.
/s/ Andre M. Mura
Andre M. Mura
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
3:21-CV-1418-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation.
It is hereby ordered that:
1) Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike will be due on May
19, 2021; and
2) Defendant’s reply supporting its motion to dismiss and motion to strike will be due on June 9,
2021.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: __________________________
__________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
05/07/2021File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.33.0.pdf
- Size
- 1,314,010 bytes
- SHA-256
- 27b706bd6372633304bb8e586efa9cd728ffda23072eb3ab8dd8ea4f542abf07
- Original
- PACER (login required)