to Respond to Complaint — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, then-docketed 4:21-cv-01418-KAW (Oakland Division), Doc. 13; filed March 2, 2021.

This source document is titled to Respond to Complaint and is classified in controlled metadata as Stipulation.

Full text

Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
Nicola C. Menaldo, WA Bar No. 44459
(pro hac vice application pending)
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA  98101-3099
Telephone:  206.359.8000
Facsimile:  206.359.9000
Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
GGallego@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA  94304-1212
Telephone:  650.838.4300
Facsimile:  650.838.4350
Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-1(a)
Current Response Date:  March 5, 2021
New Response Date:       April 5, 2021
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed
Shabazz (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 13     Filed 03/02/21     Page 1 of 4

Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
-2-
Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint on or about December 3, 2020 (“Complaint”);
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2021, Plaintiffs effected service of process of the summons
and Complaint on Thomson Reuters America Corporation as the “general manager in this state”
for Thomson Reuters;
WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters removed the case to federal court on February 26, 2021;
WHEREAS, the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is March 5,
2021;
WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters has requested, and Plaintiffs have consented to, an
additional 30 days for Thomson Reuters to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the agreed extension due to the complexity of the
underlying facts and the fact that defense counsel requires additional time to become
knowledgeable about the case to prepare an initial pleading;
WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in the case;
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
their respective counsel, that Thomson Reuters shall answer or otherwise respond to the
Complaint by April 5, 2021.

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 13     Filed 03/02/21     Page 2 of 4

Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
-3-
Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:  _____________, 2021

PERKINS COIE LLP
By:
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation

DATED:  _____________, 2021
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
By: ____________________________
Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
amm@classlawgroup.com
Eric H. Gibbs
Andre M. Mura
Amanda M. Karl
Jeffrey B. Kosbie
GIBBS LAW GROUP
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Fax: (510) 350-9701
ehg@classlawgroup.com
amm@classlawgroup.com
amk@classlawgroup.com
jbk@classlawgroup.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Jennifer D. Bennett
Neil K. Sawhney
GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 573-0336
jennifer@guptawessler.com
neil@guptawessler.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice forthcoming)
JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC.
81 Prospect St., 7th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(518) 732-6703
belga@justicecatalyst.org
abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice forthcoming)
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
OVERSIGHT PROJECT INC.
40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10006
albert@stopspying.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 13     Filed 03/02/21     Page 3 of 4

Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
-4-
Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from the other signatory.

                                                   /s/ Susan D. Fahringer

       Susan D. Fahringer

Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 13     Filed 03/02/21     Page 4 of 4

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.13.0.pdf

Size

106,572 bytes

SHA-256

4bb984f033315d8d33906c4e3e442d0b68dd01315dea9a81c5c61ad74865643b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.13.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)