Order by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 12 Motion for… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 18)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 18 · 2021-03-02 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER  
 
October 2012 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiff(s), 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Defendant(s). 
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: _______________
 
APPLICATION FOR 
ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY 
PRO HAC VICE 
(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)  
I,   
 
 
 
 
, an active member in good standing of the bar of  
 
  
 
 
, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the 
Northern District of California representing:  
 
 
 
 
 
 in the 
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is __________________________________, an 
attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office 
within the State of California. 
MY ADDRESS OF RECORD: 
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S ADDRESS OF RECORD: 
 
 
 
 
MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:  
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD: 
 
 
MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:  
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL’S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD: 
 
 
I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of 
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is:   
 
. 
A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from said 
bar is attached to this application. 
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the 
Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local Rules. 
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 
Dated:   
 
 
 
 
 
APPLICANT 
 
 
 
 
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 
 FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of  
 
 
 
 
 is granted, 
subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate 
appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local co-counsel 
designated in the application will constitute notice to the party. 
Dated: 
  
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Reset Form
CAT BROOKS, et al.,
THOMSON REUTERS CORP.,
Albert Fox Cahn, Esq.
Albert Fox Cahn, Esq.
Albert Fox Cahn, Esq.
New York State
Plaintiffs
Andre Mura
40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10006
505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, CA 94612
(571) 766-6273
(510) 350-9700
albert@stopspying.org
amm@classlawgroup.com
03/02/21
March 3, 2021
U
N
I
T
E
D
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
C
O
U
R
T
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
IT IS SO ORDERED
Judge Kandis Westmore
4:21-cv-01418 KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 18     Filed 03/03/21     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.18.0.pdf

Size

143,455 bytes

SHA-256

6feeff681ba5a791b64b5f58180516f31a20c97ba1694a8bdcc476c4968aea92

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.18.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)