Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint… — Brooks v. Thomson R…

Court filing

STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 15)

Summary

A Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Document 15, filed 03/03/21 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland Division. The parties stipulate that the current response date of March 5, 2021 is extended to a new response date of April 5, 2021, an additional 30 days that Plaintiffs consented to. The stipulation states that good cause exists due to the complexity of the underlying facts and the need for defense counsel to become knowledgeable about the case. It is dated March 3, 2021 and signed /s/ Susan D. Fahringer and /s/ Andre M. Mura.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 15).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2021-03-05-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-15-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-15-0/, SHA-256 96e411206dfa98a7c3389dded276b200ab1d778dae44563b5041739538207959.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC              Document 15     Filed 03/03/21     Page 1 of 4



 1   Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
     SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
 2   Nicola C. Menaldo, WA Bar No. 44459
     (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
 3   NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
     PERKINS COIE LLP
 4   1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
     Seattle, WA 98101-3099
 5   Telephone: 206.359.8000
     Facsimile: 206.359.9000
 6
     Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
 7   GGallego@perkinscoie.com
     PERKINS COIE LLP
 8   3150 Porter Drive
     Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 9   Telephone: 650.838.4300
     Facsimile: 650.838.4350
10

11   Attorneys for Defendant
     Thomson Reuters Corporation
12

13                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14                            NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15                                         OAKLAND DIVISION
16

17   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                            Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW
     SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
18   all others similarly situated,                    STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
                                                       DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
19                         Plaintiffs,                 COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL
                                                       RULE 6-1(a)
20          v.
                                                       Current Response Date: March 5, 2021
21   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
                                                       New Response Date:       April 5, 2021
22                         Defendant.
23

24
            Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant
25

26   Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed

27   Shabazz (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
28
     Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW                                                    Stipulation to Extend Time
                                                                                    to Respond to Complaint
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC           Document 15          Filed 03/03/21   Page 2 of 4



 1           WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint on or about December 3, 2020 (“Complaint”);
 2           WHEREAS, on January 29, 2021, Plaintiffs effected service of process of the summons
 3
     and Complaint on Thomson Reuters America Corporation as the “general manager in this state”
 4
     for Thomson Reuters;
 5
             WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters removed the case to federal court on February 26, 2021;
 6

 7           WHEREAS, the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is March 5,

 8   2021;

 9           WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters has requested, and Plaintiffs have consented to, an
10
     additional 30 days for Thomson Reuters to answer or respond to the Complaint;
11
             WHEREAS, good cause exists for the agreed extension due to the complexity of the
12
     underlying facts and the fact that defense counsel requires additional time to become
13
     knowledgeable about the case to prepare an initial pleading;
14

15           WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in the case;

16           NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
17   their respective counsel, that Thomson Reuters shall answer or otherwise respond to the
18
     Complaint by April 5, 2021.
19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW                       -2-                        Stipulation to Extend Time
                                                                                  to Respond to Complaint
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC            Document 15         Filed 03/03/21     Page 3 of 4



 1
     DATED: March 3, 2021                              PERKINS COIE LLP
 2

 3                                                     By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
                                                           Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 162978
 4                                                         SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
 5                                                     Attorneys for Defendant
                                                       Thomson Reuters Corporation
 6

 7

 8   DATED: March 3, 2021
 9
                                                       By: /s/ Andre M. Mura
10                                                         Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
                                                           amm@classlawgroup.com
11
                                                       Attorneys for Plaintiffs
12
         Eric H. Gibbs                                     Jennifer D. Bennett
13       Andre M. Mura                                     Neil K. Sawhney
         Amanda M. Karl                                    GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
14       Jeffrey B. Kosbie                                 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
         GIBBS LAW GROUP                                   San Francisco, CA 94111
15
         505 14th Street, Suite 1110                       (415) 573-0336
16       Oakland, CA 94612                                 jennifer@guptawessler.com
         Telephone: (510) 350-9700                         neil@guptawessler.com
17       Fax: (510) 350-9701
         ehg@classlawgroup.com                             Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18       amm@classlawgroup.com
         amk@classlawgroup.com
19
         jbk@classlawgroup.com
20
         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
         Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice forthcoming)          Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice forthcoming)
22       Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice forthcoming)         SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
         JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC.                         OVERSIGHT PROJECT
23       81 Prospect St., 7th Floor                        40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
         Brooklyn, NY 11201                                New York, NY 10006
24       (518) 732-6703                                    albert@stopspying.org
         belga@justicecatalyst.org
25
         abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org                     Attorneys for Plaintiffs
26
         Attorneys for Plaintiffs
27

28
     Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW                       -3-                              Stipulation to Extend Time
                                                                                        to Respond to Complaint
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC           Document 15          Filed 03/03/21    Page 4 of 4



 1                                           ATTESTATION
 2          Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
 3   has been obtained from the other signatory.
 4

 5                                                                  /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
 6                                                                     Susan D. Fahringer

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 4:21-cv-1418-KAW                       -4-                          Stipulation to Extend Time
                                                                                    to Respond to Complaint


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.15.0.pdf
Size
35,326 bytes
SHA-256
96e411206dfa98a7c3389dded276b200ab1d778dae44563b5041739538207959
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.15.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top