Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 28.2)
No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 28-2 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 28-2 Filed 04/05/21 Page 1 of 2
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com
3 Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice 3150 Porter Drive
AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 PERKINS COIE LLP Telephone: 650.838.4300
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900 Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: 206.359.8000
6 Facsimile: 206.359.9000
7 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 4:21-cv-01418-EMC
14 SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
15 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs, PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6), AND
16 MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO
v. CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL
17 PROCEDURE § 425.16
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
18 Date: June 3, 2021
Defendant. Time: 1:30 p.m.
19
Place: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
20 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:21-cv-01418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 28-2 Filed 04/05/21 Page 2 of 2
1 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure
2 12(b)(6) and Motion to Strike Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16.
3 Having considered the papers and arguments, the Court finds that for the reasons set forth
4 in Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs have failed to establish the essential elements of their
5 claims; Defendant’s speech is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and
6 Plaintiffs’ private interests do not outweigh the public interest in the dissemination of the
7 information at issue; and Plaintiffs seek to impose liability on Defendant for conduct that is
8 protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 28 U.S.C. § 230. Accordingly, the
9 Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
10 Further, for the reasons set forth in Defendant’s Motion to Strike, the Court hereby
11 GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Strike Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16.
12 Defendants shall submit any motion for attorneys’ fees and costs no later than ___________. See
13 Cal. Code. Civ. Proc. § 425.16(c)(1) (“[A] prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall
14 be entitled to recover his or her attorney’s fees and costs.”).
15
16
17 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19 DATED: __________, 2021
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
20 United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER -1- Case No. 4:21-cv-01418-EMC
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.28.2.pdf
- Size
- 117,351 bytes
- SHA-256
- 636efaa8b6023bc1ecfc8b8f1179711a360e9c5004f38ffbfe1dbc340db18f9f
- Original
- PACER (login required)