Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Amended Order Re: Joint Motion to Set A Briefing Schedule — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 560)

Court filing

Amended Order Re: Joint Motion to Set A Briefing Schedule — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 560)

Filed October 14, 2025 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-10-14

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 560 · 2025-10-14 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No.: 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB  
AMENDED ORDER RE: JOINT 
MOTION TO SET A BRIEFING 
SCHEDULE FOR PRETRIAL 
MOTIONS AND TO EXTEND PAGE 
LIMITS FOR DEFENDANT’S 
MOTION FOR PARTIAL 
SUMMARY JUDGMENT 
This Document Relates to All Actions 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 560     Filed 10/14/25     PageID.31125     Page
1 of 3

 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Motion to Set a Briefing Schedule 
for Pretrial Motions and to Extend Page Limits for Defendant’s Motion for Partial 
Summary Judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 
1. 
 Pretrial Motions are due on Friday, October 17, 2025; 
2. 
Oppositions to Pretrial Motions are due on Friday, January 9, 2026; 
3. 
Replies in Support of Pretrial Motions are due on Friday, February 20, 
2026;  
4. 
The Pretrial Motions shall be heard on Friday, April 17, 2026.   
5. 
Defendant’s opening brief in support of its partial motion for summary 
judgment shall not exceed 50 pages, and Defendant’s separate statement 
of undisputed material facts in support of same shall not exceed 50 
pages; 
6. 
Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendant’s partial motion for summary 
judgment shall not exceed 50 pages, and Plaintiffs’ response to BANA’s 
separate statement of undisputed material facts in support of same shall 
not exceed 50 pages; 
7. 
Defendant’s reply brief in support of its partial motion for summary 
judgment shall not exceed 25 pages; and 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
/ / / 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 560     Filed 10/14/25     PageID.31126     Page
2 of 3

 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8. 
All other Pretrial Motions including those addressing Daubert issues 
shall proceed according to the briefing schedule set forth herein and 
shall be subject to the page limitations set forth in Civil Local Rule 
7.1(h) and this Court’s Civil Pretrial & Trial Procedures. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
Dated:  October 7, 2025 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 560     Filed 10/14/25     PageID.31127     Page
3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.560.0.pdf
Size
161,670 bytes
SHA-256
c8a46224b8c8929e44d22e164ae83fef1afd55db38e6d5055da229cef72f3a74
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.560.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top