Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 DISPOSITIVE ORDER of USCA as to Appeal Document Filed. (All non-registered users… — Bof…

Court filing

DISPOSITIVE ORDER of USCA as to Appeal Document Filed. (All non-registered users… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 557)

Summary

An order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Kuang Ting Chong, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 25-4072, filed in the district court on 09/25/25 as Document 557 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB. Circuit Judges Sung and H.A. Thomas deny Bank of America's petition for permission to appeal under Rule 23(f), after granting the bank leave to file a reply in support. The panel also grants unopposed motions to keep the answer to the petition, one volume of the supplemental appendix and portions of the petition and reply under seal. The clerk is directed to file the motions to seal publicly.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 25, 2025 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1602 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-09-25

Cite this document

“DISPOSITIVE ORDER of USCA as to Appeal Document Filed. (All non-registered users… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 557).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 557, filed 2025-09-25. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/2025-09-25-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-557-0-doc-557/, SHA-256 f747ec215467a8c676fb68ee4a10d7da6ffb6f7c3efac770ad4f69bb5528ea04.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
 
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
 
IN RE:  BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
___________________________________ 
KUANG TING CHONG; et al., 
                    Plaintiffs - Respondents, 
  v. 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 
                    Defendant - Petitioner. 
No. 25-4072 
D.C. No. 
3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
Southern District of California,  
San Diego 
ORDER 
 
Before: SUNG and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 
 
The motion (Docket Entry No. 20) for leave to file a reply in support of the 
petition for permission to appeal is granted. 
 
The petition for permission to appeal is denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); 
Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952, 959-60 (9th Cir. 2005) (describing 
factors this court considers in analyzing a Rule 23(f) petition). 
 
Respondents filed a notice (Docket Entry No. 16) of intent to file publicly 
the answer to the petition and Volume 2 of the supplemental appendix. See 9th Cir. 
R. 27-13(f). The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 25) to maintain these 
documents under seal is granted. The unopposed motions (Docket Entry Nos. 3 
FILED 
 
SEP 25 2025 
 
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 557     Filed 09/25/25     PageID.30439     Page
1 of 2

 
 
 
 
 
 
2 
25-4072 
and 21) to seal portions of the petition, the reply brief, and supporting documents 
are also granted.  
The clerk will file publicly the motions to seal (Docket Entry Nos. 3.1, 21.1, 
and 25.1). The clerk will maintain the documents under seal at Docket Entry Nos. 
4, 5, 19, and 22. 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 557     Filed 09/25/25     PageID.30440     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.557.0.pdf
Size
139,765 bytes
SHA-256
f747ec215467a8c676fb68ee4a10d7da6ffb6f7c3efac770ad4f69bb5528ea04
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.557.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top