Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to File Documents Under Seal in its Reply in… — Bofa…

Court filing

ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to File Documents Under Seal in its Reply in… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 547)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-08-12

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 547 · 2025-08-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An order in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, dated August 12, 2025 and entered as Document 547. It grants the defendant's motion to file documents under seal, Dkt. No. 539, in connection with its reply in support of its motion to stay pending resolution of a Rule 23(f) petition. The court finds that good cause exists and seals portions of Exhibit 1 to a declaration supporting the reply and portions of the reply itself. The order is two pages and is issued before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
ORDER GRANTING 
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 
SEAL IN ITS REPLY IN 
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO 
STAY PENDING RESOLUTION 
OF RULE 23(f) PETITION 
[Dkt. No. 539.] 
Ctrm:   
2D - 2nd Floor 
Judge:  
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
   
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 547     Filed 08/12/25     PageID.30299     Page
1 of 2

 
 
 
 
1 
 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ORDER 
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal in 
its Reply in Support of its Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Rule 23(f) Petition 
(“Motion to Seal”), the Court concludes that good cause exists to seal the documents.  
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Seal the following: 
• Portions of Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Valerie Haggans in Support 
of Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Stay Pending 
Resolution of Rule 23(f) Petition, and 
• Portions of Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Stay Pending 
Resolution of Rule 23(f) Petition. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:  August 12, 2025 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 547     Filed 08/12/25     PageID.30300     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.547.0.pdf
Size
147,793 bytes
SHA-256
03244637f98d9d8fd344746ef41b900bcb84bc32c5da105e28693b4322eba09f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.547.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top