Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority; Plaintiffs' Request to Lift Stay by Consolidated… — B…

Court filing

NOTICE of Supplemental Authority; Plaintiffs' Request to Lift Stay by Consolidated… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 491)

Summary

Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority and Request to Lift Stay, filed 06/05/25 as Document 491 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB in the Southern District of California, before Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel. Plaintiffs report that on June 5, 2025 the Supreme Court of the United States dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in Laboratory Corporation of American Holdings dba LabCorp v. Luke Davis, et al., No. 24-304. They say the ruling bears on their Motion for Class Certification and on the Court's order granting the bank's motion to stay pending Supreme Court review. They ask the Court to lift the stay and decide the fully briefed and argued class certification motion.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed June 5, 2025 in Bofa Ca Unemployment; one of 1602 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-06-05

Cite this document

“NOTICE of Supplemental Authority; Plaintiffs' Request to Lift Stay by Consolidated… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 491).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 491, filed 2025-06-05. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/2025-06-05-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-491-0-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-491-0/, SHA-256 412ba5f97736497321c3c283cb1ab3a239f8eeb0a50de4a5875bbbbbd5692a94.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Notice of Supplemental Authority;  Plaintiffs’ Request to Lift Stay;  
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36324) 
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com 
BRIAN DANITZ (SBN 247403) 
bdanitz@cpmlegal.com 
KARIN B. SWOPE (Pro Hac Vice) 
kswope@cpmlegal.com 
VASTI S. MONTIEL (SBN 346409) 
vmontiel@cpmlegal.com 
CAROLINE A. YUEN (SBN 354388) 
cyuen@cpmlegal.com 
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 
840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200 
Burlingame, CA 94010 
Telephone: (650) 697-6000 
Fax: (650) 697-0577 
MICHAEL RUBIN (SBN 80618) 
mrubin@altber.com 
STACEY M. LEYTON (SBN 203827) 
sleyton@altber.com 
CONNIE K. CHAN (SBN 284230) 
cchan@altber.com 
COLIN C. JONES (SBN 354301) 
cjones@altber.com 
CAROLINE HUNSICKER (SBN 356917) 
chunsicker@altber.com 
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 
177 Post Street, Suite 300 
San Francisco, CA 94108 
Telephone: (415) 421-7151 
Fax: (415) 362-8064 
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class  
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
IN RE BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB 
 
NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 
AUTHORITY;  PLAINTIFFS’ 
REQUEST TO LIFT STAY 
 
This Document Relates to All Actions 
Judge:  
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
Ctrm:  
2D (2nd Floor) 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 491     Filed 06/05/25     PageID.28941     Page
1 of 3

 
Notice of Supplemental Authority;  Plaintiffs’ Request to Lift Stay;  
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
1
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United 
States issued an Opinion that dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in 
Laboratory Corporation of American Holdings dba LabCorp v. Luke Davis, et al., No. 
24-304, 605 U.S. ___ (2025). This opinion is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and is relevant 
to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 386-2) and the Court’s Order Granting 
Defendant’s Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Review as it relates to class 
certification and subsequent dispositive motion practice (Dkt. 448). Accordingly, 
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court lift the existing stay and, at its earliest 
convenience, decide Plaintiffs’ fully briefed and argued Motion for Class Certification.  
Respectfully submitted, 
Dated:  June 5, 2025 
 
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 
 
By:  /s/ Brian Danitz 
 
 
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT  
BRIAN DANITZ  
KARIN B. SWOPE  
DAVID G. HOLLENBERG 
BLAIR V. KITTLE 
VASTI S. MONTIEL 
CAROLINE A. YUEN 
 
 
Dated:  June 5, 2025 
 
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 
 
By:  /s/ Michael Rubin  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
MICHAEL RUBIN  
STACEY M. LEYTON  
CONNIE K. CHAN 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COLIN C. JONES 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAROLINE HUNSICKER 
 
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the 
Proposed Class   
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 491     Filed 06/05/25     PageID.28942     Page
2 of 3

 
Notice of Supplemental Authority;  Plaintiffs’ Request to Lift Stay;  
Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
2
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 
Pursuant to section 2(f)(4) of the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and 
Procedures Manual, I, Brian Danitz, attest that the other signatories listed, and on whose 
behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing content and have authorized this filing. 
 
Dated: June 5, 2025 
 
 
 
/s/ Brian Danitz 
 
 
    Brian Danitz 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 491     Filed 06/05/25     PageID.28943     Page
3 of 3

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.491.0.pdf
Size
301,074 bytes
SHA-256
412ba5f97736497321c3c283cb1ab3a239f8eeb0a50de4a5875bbbbbd5692a94
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.491.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top