Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Notice of Opposition by Bank of America, N.A. — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 480, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Notice of Opposition by Bank of America, N.A. — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 480, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Filed May 7, 2025 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2025-05-07

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 480 · 2025-05-07 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION  CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
JAMES W. MCGARRY (pro hac vice) 
JMcGarry@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
100 Northern Avenue 
Boston, MA  02210 
Tel.: +1 617 570 1000 
Fax: +1 617 523 1231 
SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH (pro hac vice) 
SRoseSmith@goodwinlaw.com 
MATTHEW L. RIFFEE (pro hac vice) 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
1900 N Street, NW 
Washington, DC 20036 
Tel.: +1 202 346 4000 
Fax: +1 202 346 4444 
YVONNE W. CHAN (pro hac vice) 
YChan@jonesday.com 
JONES DAY 
100 High Street 
Boston, MA  02110 
Tel.: +1 617 960 3939 
Fax: +1 617 449 6999 
Attorneys for Defendant  
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 
[ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED IN SIGNATURE BLOCK] 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
SAN DIEGO DIVISION 
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA 
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT 
BENEFITS LITIGATION 
Case No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB 
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO 
PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE 
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 
SURREPLY TO DEFENDANT’S 
MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE 
ORDER 
  
Ctrm:   
 2D – 2nd Floor    
Judge:  
 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 480     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28869     Page
1 of 4

 
 
 
1 
 
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION  CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB  
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
Pursuant to the provision of the Court’s Civil Pretrial & Trial Procedures 
concerning ex parte motions, Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) files this 
notice of its opposition to Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a Surreply to 
Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. No. 479).  BANA will file its brief 
in opposition to this motion on or before May 9, 2025.1    
 
Dated:   May 7, 2025 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
By: s/ Laura G. Brys 
 
MATTHEW L. RIFFEE (pro hac vice) 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
THOMAS M. HEFFERON (pro hac vice) 
THefferon@goodwinlaw.com 
SABRINA M. ROSE-SMITH (pro hac vice) 
SRoseSmith@goodwinlaw.com 
MATTHEW L. RIFFEE (pro hac vice) 
MRiffee@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
1900 N St. NW  
Washington, DC 20036  
Tel: +1 202 346 4000  
Fax: +1 202 346 4444 
JAMES W. MCGARRY (pro hac vice) 
JMcGarry@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
100 Northern Avenue 
Boston, MA  02210 
Tel.: +1 617 570 1000 
Fax: +1 617 523 1231 
LAURA G. BRYS (SBN 242100) 
LBrys@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
601 S Figueroa St., Suite 4100 
Los Angeles, CA 90017 
Tel.: +1 213 426 2500 
Fax: +1 617 346 4444 
VALERIE A. HAGGANS (pro hac vice) 
VHaggans@goodwinlaw.com 
LINDSAY E. HOYLE (pro hac vice) 
 
1 BANA’s proposed opposition date takes into consideration Plaintiffs’ failure to 
notify BANA and its counsel of their intent to file the ex parte motion before it was 
filed.  Additionally, Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion does not comply with Local Rule 
83.3(g) because it does not include either an affidavit identifying Plaintiffs’ 
attempts to notify BANA prior to filing or any reason that notice should not be 
required.   
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 480     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28870     Page
2 of 4

 
 
 
2 
 
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION  CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB  
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
LHoyle@goodwinlaw.com 
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 
620 Eighth Avenue 
New York, NY 10018 
Tel: +1 212 813-8800 
Fax: +1 212 355-3333 
YVONNE W. CHAN (pro hac vice) 
YChan@jonesday.com 
JONES DAY 
100 High Street 
Boston, MA  02110 
Tel.: +1 617 960 3939 
Fax: +1 617 449 6999 
JANICE P. BROWN (SBN 114433) 
jbrown@myersnave.com 
MATTHEW B. NAZARETH (SBN 
278405) 
mnazareth@myersnave.com 
MEYERS NAVE 
600 B Street, Suite 1650 
San Diego, CA 92101 
Attorneys for Defendant 
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 480     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28871     Page
3 of 4

 
 
 
3 
 
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE MOTION  CASE NO. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB  
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the clerk of the 
court for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California by 
using the CM/ECF system on May 7, 2025.  I further certify that all participants in 
the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the 
CM/ECF system. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and 
correct. 
 
 
 
Executed: 
May 7, 2025 
 
s/ Laura G. Brys 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 480     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28872     Page
4 of 4

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.480.0.pdf
Size
201,071 bytes
SHA-256
6527b25d58197e8b93f604b493f0162d6542529495edfd38adfeac87e4e0a050
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.480.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
  1. NOTICE of Supplemental Authority; Plaintiffs' Request to Lift Stay by Consolidated… — Bofa Ca Unemployment (Dkt. 491)same case · 2025-06-05
  2. Document Withdrawn by Filer per 493 Notice of Appearance — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 489)same case · 2025-06-03
  3. Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 488)same case · 2025-06-02
  4. Response in Opposition re 503 Motion for Reconsideration — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 526)same docket · 2025-05-29
  5. Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Expert Discovery Cutoff — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 485)same docket · 2025-05-16
  6. Motion - Motion. See Hammett v. Sherman, 2020 WL 1908775, at (2025-05-09)same docket · 2025-05-09
  7. BANA EDD - Motion to Seal Opp Mot Leave Surreplysame docket · 2025-05-09
  8. Motion - Kyc Company Litigation (2025-05-07)same docket · 2025-05-07
  9. Aoe to Hoyle Decl. ISO Protective Order Case no.: 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSBsame docket · 2025-05-02
  10. UNREDACTED] Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion for asame docket · 2025-05-02
  11. Exhibit 20 — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 473-4, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same docket · 2025-05-02
  12. Declaration re 472 Reply to Response to Motion by Defendant Bank of America, N.A. — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 473)same case · 2025-05-02
  13. Reply to Response to Motion re 453 Motion for Protective Order — In re BofA Unemployment Litigation (Dkt. 472)same case · 2025-05-02
  14. Motion - Kyc Company Litigation (2025-04-29)same docket · 2025-04-29
  15. Appendix of Exhibits — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 465-2, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2025-04-25
  16. Declaration of Brian Danitz — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 465-1, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2025-04-25
  17. Response in Opposition re 453 Motion — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 465, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)same case · 2025-04-25
  18. BANA EDD - Notice of Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Reviewsame docket · 2025-04-25
  19. BANA EDD- Reply ISO Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Reviewsame docket · 2025-04-25
  20. BANA EDD - Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Court Reviewsame docket · 2025-04-25

Part of: In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · Pandemic unemployment insurance · Lender and platform litigation · Notices · 2025 · Court filings

Back to top