Motion - Kyc Company Litigation (2025-05-07)

Summary

An Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Seal Documents Filed in Support of Its Reply in Support of Its Motion for a Protective Order, filed May 7, 2025 as Document 477 in In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, San Diego Division, Judge Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel. The order states that, upon consideration of the motion, the Court concludes that good cause exists to seal the documents. It grants the motion to seal portions of Defendant's Reply, portions of the Declaration of Lindsay E. Hoyle, portions of Hoyle Declaration Exhibits 20 and 21, and Hoyle Declaration Exhibits 18 and 19 in their entirety.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN DIEGO DIVISION
IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA
CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS LITIGATION
Case No. 3:21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
SEAL DOCUMENTS FILED IN
SUPPORT OF ITS REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Ctrm:
2D - 2nd Floor
Judge:
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 477     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28806     Page
1 of 2

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Seal Documents Filed in Support
of its Reply in Support of its Motion for a Protective Order, the Court concludes that
good cause exists to seal the documents.  Accordingly the Court GRANTS
Defendant’s Motion to Seal the following:
•
Portions of Defendant’s Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion for a
Protective Order;
•
Portions of Declaration of Lindsay E. Hoyle in Support of Defendant’s
Reply in Support of its Motion for Protective Order;
•
Portions of Hoyle Declaration Exhibits 20 and 21; and
•
Hoyle Declaration Exhibits 18 and 19 in their entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  May 7, 2025

Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 477     Filed 05/07/25     PageID.28807     Page
2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.477.0.pdf

Size

144,567 bytes

SHA-256

6b0aaff60628521ad7b684d79498030274dccd31bde599c757c14b898db0e540

Our copy

gov.uscourts.casd.709615.477.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)