Exhibit — Plaintiffs' Deposition Testimony Summary — Klaassen v. Indiana University (N.D. Ind., 2021-07-12, 1)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana · No. 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC · Doc. 32-22 · 2021-07-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA 
FORT WAYNE DIVISION 
 
RYAN KLAASSEN, JAIME CARINI,        ) 
D.J.B., by and though his next friend and 
) 
 
 
 father, DANIEL G. BAUMGARTNER,  
) 
ASHLEE MORRIS, SETH CROWDER,  
) 
 MACEY POLICKA, MARGARET ROTH,  ) 
 and NATALIE SPERAZZA,  
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
) 
Case No. 1:21-cv-00238 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
 
vs. 
 
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY ) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
Defendant. 
 
 
) 
           
PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION TESTIMONY RELEVANT TO  
STANDING AND ALLEGED IRREPARABLE HARM 
 
PLAINTIFF 
VACCINE 
EXEMPTION 
STATUS 
BASIS FOR 
OBJECTION TO 
EXTRA 
REQUIREMENTS 
ALLEGED 
HARM FROM 
MASKING 
PAST MASKING 
EXPERIENCE 
ALLEGED HARM 
FROM TESTING 
PAST COVID 
TESTING 
EXPERIENCE 
 
Baumgartner 
 
Ex. 122 
Religious exemption 
granted  
 
Compl. ¶ 196 
Religious 
Practical 
 
Compl. ¶ 197, 42:5-14 
33:23-39:18 
18:16-21:10 
37:19-39:10; 39:19-
40:10 
26:22-24 
 
Carini 
 
Ex. 121 
Religious exemption 
granted, would prefer 
medical  
  
Compl. ¶ 194 
Religious 
Unreasonable 
 
Compl. ¶ 192; 86:2-
86:18 
 
47:18-55:2; 
86:25-87:22; 
90:19-92:6 
 
43:17-45:6; 47:9-12 
55:3-56:25; 86:25-
87:22 
40:20-41:19; 45:7-
47:8; 74:9-75:16 
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 32-22   filed 07/12/21   page 1 of 2

 
2 
 
 
Crowder 
 
Ex. 124 
Religious exemption 
granted 
 
Compl. ¶ 205 
Religious 
 
Compl. ¶ 206 
30:6-31:7; 31:21-
39:8; 17:8-13 
21:20-23:9 
39:17-41:2; 41:23-
42:10 
26:3-4 
 
Klaassen 
 
Ex. 120 
Religious exemption 
granted 
 
Compl. ¶ 180 
Unreasonable  
 
Compl. ¶ 181 
36:1-41:19; 
46:22-48:3 
27:1-7  
32:3-33:2 
 
27:13-29:2 
 
Morris 
 
Ex. 123 
Religious exemption 
granted 
 
Compl. ¶ 201  
 
Religious 
Unfair 
Unnecessary 
Health Concerns 
 
Compl. ¶ 202 
 
45:8-52:2; 68:20-73:15 
16:7-23; 38:12-
43:9; 58:12-64:7  
20:14-21:7; 35:14-
38:11; 57:3-15 
35:11-13; 79:16-
81:20 
26:5-2-34:2 34:12-
35:10 
 
Policka 
 
Ex. 125  
Religious exemption 
granted  
 
Compl. ¶ 207 
Unfair 
Unreasonable  
 
Compl. ¶ 208 
 
22:20-23:5; 26:18-28:21 
25:2-10; 26:12-
17; 35:20-36:11; 
36:17-21; 40:23-
42:20; 45:19-
46:5; 46:22-47:4 
17:6-18:16; 19:2-12 
15:6-16:18; 25:11-14; 
26:12-17; 36:6-11; 
36:17-21 
 
15:6-17:5 
 
Roth 
 
Ex. 126 
Has sincerely held 
religious objection; has 
not sought exemption 
 
Compl. ¶ 213 
 
45:12-46:9 
Health Concerns 
 
Compl. ¶ 212 
 
46:23-47:10 
27:3- 28:13; 
29:22-31:3; 34:7-
35:13; 49:5-51:2 
31:12-34:10  
Compl. ¶ 211 
 
35:14-36:24; 38:16-
39:1 
 
37:19-20 
 
Sperazza 
 
Ex. 127 
Does not qualify 
 
15:21-16:23 
Unreasonable  
Health Concerns 
 
Compl. ¶ 216 
34:2-36:10; 
55:13-56:16; 
66:5-10 
13:9-24; 29:20-
32:10 
38:16-39:12; 40:6-17; 
40:22-41:20; 66:11-
14 
24:10-28:7 
 
USDC IN/ND case 1:21-cv-00238-DRL-SLC   document 32-22   filed 07/12/21   page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.innd.107499.32.22.pdf

Size

153,199 bytes

SHA-256

99a54024f6c65b9095c599330655411a91e89e35f3485b08e75e364d71b16dd2

Our copy

gov.uscourts.innd.107499.32.22.pdf

Original

archive.org