Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Plaid Privacy In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 52-4, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Court filing

Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 52-4, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Filed July 22, 2020 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation; one of 174 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-07-22

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 52-4 · 2020-07-22 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EVANS PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER 
WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
JAMES COTTLE AND FREDERICK 
SCHOENEMAN, on behalf of themselves 
and all others similarly situated, 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
v. 
 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation, 
 
Defendants. 
 
Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
EVANS PLAINTIFFS’ 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES 
SHOULD BE RELATED 
 
CLASS ACTION 
  
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 52-4     Filed 07/22/20     Page 1 of 2

 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EVANS PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER 
WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 
2 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
Plaintiffs David Evans, Patrick Lenahen, Adam Smotkin, and Oswaldo Herrera (the 
“Evans” Plaintiffs) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related was 
filed with this Court on July 22, 2020, and the Court having considered the papers and 
pleadings on file, and good cause appearing therefor, hereby GRANTS the Evans Plaintiffs’ 
Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related. 
 
IT IS ORDERED that the Evans Plaintiffs’ action, Evans, et al. v. Plaid, Inc., No. 3:20-
cv-04804-JSC, be related to Cottle v. Plaid, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR. 
 
 
Dated: ___________________ 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Honorable Donna M. Ryu 
United States Magistrate Judge 
 
  
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 52-4     Filed 07/22/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.52.4.pdf
Size
210,468 bytes
SHA-256
a18230e6ee3a737d055beeb4bd20f1b28ba764fba1d6f99b48ebbffc70e2b4bd
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.52.4.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top