Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Plaid Privacy In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 49-4, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Court filing

Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 49-4, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Filed July 17, 2020 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation; one of 174 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-07-17

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 49-4 · 2020-07-17 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT TO RELATE 
CASES 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
JAMES COTTLE AND FREDERICK 
SCHOENEMAN, on behalf of 
themselves and all others similarly 
situated, 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
v. 
 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation, 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
Case No.: 4:20-cv-03056 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
ANDERSON PLAINTIFFS’ 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD 
BE RELATED  
 
 
CLASS ACTION 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 49-4     Filed 07/17/20     Page 1 of 2

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT TO RELATE 
CASES 
 
 
Plaintiffs Carrie Anderson, Brian McCrudden and Jeffrey Schwedock’s (the “Anderson” 
Plaintiffs) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related was filed with 
this Court on July 17, 2020, and the Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and 
good cause appearing therefor, hereby GRANTS the Anderson Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion 
to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related.  
IT IS ORDERED that the Anderson Plaintiffs’ action, Anderson, et al. v. Plaid, Inc., No. 
3:20-cv-04480, be related to Cottle v. Plaid, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-3056.  
 
 
Dated:   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Honorable Donna M. Ryu 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Magistrate Judge  
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 49-4     Filed 07/17/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.49.4.pdf
Size
22,927 bytes
SHA-256
e26371d7d4d738f4fdf3db4b1691899f3072553984a060c4a9249fa59e61f095
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.49.4.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top