Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 42-2, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 42-2 · 2020-07-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE CASES   
 
QUADRA & COLL, LLP 
James A. Quadra (SBN 131084) 
jquadra@quadracoll.com 
Rebecca Coll (SBN 184468) 
rcoll@quadracoll.com 
649 Mission Street, 5th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94105 
Tel:  (415) 426-3502 
Fax: (415) 625-9936 
NUSSBAUM LAW GROUP, P.C. 
Linda P. Nussbaum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 
lnussbaum@nussbaumpc.com 
Bart D. Cohen (Pro Hac Vice to be Filed) 
bcohen@nussbaumpc.com 
1211 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor 
New York, NY 10036 
Tel: (917) 438-9102 
Fax: (212) 753-0396 
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rachel Curtis, Alexa Grossman, Mallory Grossman, Steven Hannigan, 
Alexis Mullen, Jordan Sacks, and Nicholas Yeomelakis and the Proposed Class 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
JAMES COTTLE AND FREDERICK  
SCHOENEMAN, on behalf of 
themselves and all others similarly 
situated, 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
v. 
 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation, 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
Case No. 4:20-CV-03056 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
RELATE CASES  
 
CLASS ACTION 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 42-2     Filed 07/08/20     Page 1 of 2

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056 
 
- 1 - 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO RELATE CASES   
 
On July 8, 2020, Plaintiffs Rachel Curtis, Alexa Grossman, Mallory Grossman, Steven 
Hannigan, Alexis Mullen, Jordan Sacks, and Nicholas Yeomelakis filed an Administrative 
Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12. The 
time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. 
The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, 
GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. 
It is ORDERED that Curtis v. Plaid Inc., No. 4:20-cv-04344-DMR, be related to the 
above-captioned action. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated: ______________________ 
 
 
_______________________________ 
      Honorable Donna M. Ryu  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      United States Magistrate Judge 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 42-2     Filed 07/08/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.42.2.pdf

Size

169,563 bytes

SHA-256

2dca6b0bebc41a0e72b2e1464723b8cdb1a42a13e35daff0559d9173c184d162

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.42.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)