Proposed Order Granting Administrative Motion To Relate Cases — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 37.4)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 37-4 · 2020-06-26 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 
MOUNTAIN VIEW 
 
 
[Proposed] Order Granting Administrative  
Motion to Relate Cases 
 
No. 4:20-cv-3056 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
Michael F. Ram (SBN 104805) 
Aaron M. Sheanin (SBN 214472) 
mram@robinskaplan.com 
asheanin@robinskaplan.com 
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 
2440 W El Camino Real, Suite 100 
Mountain View, CA 94040 
Telephone: (650) 784-4040 
 
Kellie Lerner (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 
Hollis Salzman (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 
William Reiss (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 
David Rochelson (Pro Hac Vice to be filed) 
klerner@robinskaplan.com 
hsalzman@robinskaplan.com  
wreiss@robinskaplan.com 
drochelson@robinskaplan.com 
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP 
399 Park Avenue, Suite 3600 
New York, NY 10022 
Telephone: (212) 980-7400 
Attorneys for Plaintiff Logan Mitchell and the 
Proposed Classes 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
JAMES COTTLE and FREDERICK 
SCHOENEMAN on behalf of themselves 
and all others similarly situated,, 
Plaintiff, 
v. 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation, 
Defendant. 
Case No. 4:20-cv-3056 
Case No. 3:20-cv-4230 
 
CLASS ACTION 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
RELATE CASES 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 37-4     Filed 06/26/20     Page 1 of 2

 
 
[Proposed] Order Granting Administrative  
Motion to Relate Cases 
2 
No. 4:20-cv-3056 
 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
On June 26, 2020, Plaintiff Logan Mitchell filed an Administrative Motion to Consider 
Whether Cases Should Be Related pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 and 7-11.  The time for filing 
an opposition or statement of support has passed. 
The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, 
HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be 
Related. 
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s action, Mitchell v. Plaid Inc., No. 3:20-cv-4230, be 
related to Cottle v. Plaid Inc., No. 4:20-cv-3056. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
Dated:   
 
 
 
 
Honorable Donna M. Ryu 
 
United States Magistrate Judge 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 37-4     Filed 06/26/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.37.4.pdf

Size

57,609 bytes

SHA-256

9a529fc4dd955baa1a16e29482d860bb15a2b8bdd4d276451d68487050e4117b

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.37.4.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)