Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Plaid Privacy In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation — N.D. Cal., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR ORDER RELATING CASES: 3:20-cv-04230-SK Mitchell v.… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 56)

Court filing

ORDER RELATING CASES: 3:20-cv-04230-SK Mitchell v.… — Plaid Privacy (Dkt. 56)

Filed July 29, 2020 in Plaid Privacy; one of 174 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2020-07-29

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 56 · 2020-07-29 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
RELATED CASE ORDER 
 
 
A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a 
Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been 
filed.  The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed.  As the judge assigned 
to case   
 
20-cv-03056-DMR 
Cottle v. Plaid Inc. 
 
I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case 
assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me.  Any cases listed below that are not 
related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case 
for a related case determination. 
 
 
Case 
Title 
Related
Not Related
20-cv-04230-SK 
Mitchell v. Plaid Inc.
DMR
20-cv-04344-DMR Curtis v. Plaid Inc.
DMR
20-cv-04480-JSC 
Anderson v. Plaid Inc.
DMR
20-cv-04804-JSC 
Evans v. Plaid Inc.
DMR
 
ORDER 
 
The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the 
initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management 
conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court.  The parties shall adjust the 
dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. 
Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re- 
noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local 
Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to 
govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned 
judge. 
 
 
Dated:  July 29, 2020  
By:  
 
 
Donna M. Ryu 
 
United States Magistrate Judge 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 56     Filed 07/29/20     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.56.0.pdf
Size
29,234 bytes
SHA-256
644175d241ff9e70977d438f65712bce670f59e84c7fb5ddfb10db21bf040a04
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.359040.56.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top