Court filing

Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 55-3, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Summary

A proposed order granting in part Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, Document 55-3, filed 07/28/20 in James Cottle, et al. v. Plaid Inc., No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division. As drafted, the order would vacate the Initial Case Management Conference set for August 5, 2020 and reset it for the first available date no less than 14 days after the resolution (by the Court) of Defendant's response to the forthcoming Amended Complaint. It would also vacate the July 29, 2020 deadline for the Rule 26(f) Report, initial disclosures and Case Management Statement and continue it to seven days before the reset conference. The two-page form has a blank date line and a signature line for Hon. Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed May 4, 2020 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation; one of 285 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2020-05-04

Cite this document

“Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 55-3, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR, Doc. 55-3, filed 2020-05-04. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-plaid-privacy-cand-359040/2020-05-04-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-55-3-gov-uscourts-cand-359040-55-3/, SHA-256 301a28a76e857f7a0748e252d02a7d0446d5369c4e738a81991d59a804b96e8b.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC IN PART 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
JAMES COTTLE, et al., 
Plaintiffs, 
v. 
PLAID INC., 
Defendant. 
CASE NO. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION 
TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT 
CONFERENCE IN PART 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
 
 
 
Action Filed: 
May 4, 2020 
Trial Date: 
None Set 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 55-3     Filed 07/28/20     Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
1 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC IN PART 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management 
Conference.  The Court has considered the papers and, good cause appearing, GRANTS the motion IN 
PART.  It is hereby ORDERED that: 
The Initial Case Management Conference set for August 5, 2020 is hereby vacated, and shall 
be reset for the first available date no less than 14 days after the Court’s resolution of Defendant’s 
response to the forthcoming Amended Complaint. 
The parties’ deadline to file their Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state 
objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per Standing Order re Contents of 
Joint Case Management Statement, currently set for July 29, 2020, is hereby vacated and shall be 
continued to seven days before the Initial Case Management Conference. 
IT IS SO ORDERED.  
 
Dated:______________ 
     ____________________________________ 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
United States Magistrate Judge 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 55-3     Filed 07/28/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.359040.55.3.pdf
Size: 110,720 bytes
SHA-256: 301a28a76e857f7a0748e252d02a7d0446d5369c4e738a81991d59a804b96e8b
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.359040.55.3.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)