Court filing
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 74 Stipulation — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 75, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)
Filed May 4, 2020 in In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation; one of 174 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-05-04 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 75 · 2020-05-04 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 196046
edettmer@gibsondunn.com
ABIGAIL A. BARRERA, SBN 301746
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
ASHLEY J. HODGE, SBN 287653
ahodge@gibsondunn.com
ANTHONY D. BEDEL, SBN 324065
tbedel@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
ALEXANDER H. SOUTHWELL (pro hac vice)
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: 212.351.4000
Facsimile: 212.351.4035
Attorneys for Defendant PLAID INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION
______________________________________
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
ALL ACTIONS
Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-12
Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Action Filed:
May 4, 2020
Trial Date:
None Set
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Defendant Plaid Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Caroline
Anderson, James Cottle, Rachel Curtis, David Evans, Logan Mitchell, Alexis Mullen, Jordan Sacks,
Frederick Schoeneman, Gabriel Sotelo, Jeffrey Umali, Nicholas Yeomelakis, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, respectfully
submit this stipulation to seek extensions on the page limits applicable to the briefings on
Defendant’s anticipated motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint.
WHEREAS, certain Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a Complaint on May 4, 2020,
see Dkt. No. 1;
WHEREAS, certain Plaintiffs subsequently filed four additional lawsuits against Plaid,
consisting of related allegations and claims;
WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ stipulation to consolidate the five lawsuits (ECF
No. 57);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”), asserting ten (10)
claims for relief on behalf of alleged nationwide and California classes (ECF No. 61);
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) sets a 25-page limit for a memorandum in support of a
motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) sets a 25-page limit for a memorandum in support of an
opposition to a motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3(c) sets a 15-page limit for a memorandum in support of a
reply to an opposition to a motion to dismiss;
WHEREAS, no previous page limit modifications have been made in the case, whether by
stipulation or Court order;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred about the subject matter of the stipulation;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the page limitations provided for in the Civil Local Rules
are inadequate to fully address the factual allegations and causes of action set forth in the CAC, and
that the Court will benefit from more thorough briefing by the Parties; and
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
undersigned counsel for the parties in this action, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 that:
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to
dismiss shall be limited to 40 pages;
Plaintiffs’ memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s
motion to dismiss shall be limited to 45 pages; and
Defendant’s reply brief shall be limited to 20 pages, except in the case that
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to
dismiss is less than 40 pages, Defendant shall be permitted to extend its reply brief
by the difference between the length of its memorandum of points and authorities
in support of its motion to dismiss and 40 pages, but in no event will the reply
brief exceed 25 pages.
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, below.
Dated: September 8, 2020
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By: /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer
Ethan D. Dettmer (SBN 196046)
Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746)
Ashley J. Hodge (SBN 287653)
Anthony D. Bedel (SBN 324065)
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Fax: 415.393.8306
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
ahodge@gibsondunn.com
tbedel@gibsondunn.com
Alexander H. Southwell (pro hac vice)
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor
New York, NY 10166
Telephone: 212.351.4000
Fax: 212.351.4035
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com
Attorneys for Defendant Plaid Inc.
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 3 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
Dated: September 8, 2020
By:
/s/ Shawn M. Kennedy
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472)
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912)
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826)
HERRERA PURDY LLP
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Telephone: (949) 936-0900
Fax: (855) 969-2050
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332)
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891)
HERRERA PURDY LLP
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 422-4700
Fax: (855) 969-2050
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com
Rachel Geman (pro hac vice)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: (212) 355-9500
Fax: (212) 355-9592
rgeman@lchb.com
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857)
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096)
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Fax: (415) 956-1008
msobol@lchb.commgardner@lchb.com
Warren T. Burns (pro hac vice)
Russell Herman (pro hac vice)
BURNS CHAREST LLP
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75202
Telephone: (469) 904-4550
Fax: (469) 444-5002
wburns@burnscharest.com
rherman@burnscharest.com
Christopher J. Cormier (pro hac vice)
BURNS CHAREST LLP
5290 Denver Tech Center Parkway, Suite 150
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
Telephone: (720) 630-2092
Fax: (469) 444-5002
ccormier@burnscharest.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 4 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the above Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order To Extend Page Limits
Pursuant To Civil Local Rule 7-12, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to
dismiss shall be limited to 40 pages;
Plaintiffs’ memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s
motion to dismiss shall be limited to 45 pages; and
Defendant’s reply brief shall be limited to 20 pages, except in the case that
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to
dismiss is less than 40 pages, Defendant shall be permitted to extend its reply brief
by the difference between the length of its memorandum of points and authorities
in support of its motion to dismiss and 40 pages, but in no event will the reply
brief exceed 25 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ____________, 2020
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
U
N
I
T
E
D
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
C
O
U
R
T
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
IT IS SO ORDERED
Judge Donna M. Ryu
Sept. 11
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 5 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Ethan D. Dettmer, hereby certify that on September 8, 2020, I caused the foregoing Joint
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Page Limits Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 to be
electronically filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be served to all counsel
of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system.
/s/ Ethan D. Dettmer
Ethan D. Dettmer
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR Document 75 Filed 09/11/20 Page 6 of 6File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.359040.75.0.pdf
- Size
- 204,227 bytes
- SHA-256
- d772a96b9d18844e9948b0e04f72e76ed18be29ce8cfc5eb708632c8e10087f3
- Original
- PACER (login required)