Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File Excess Pages — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 74, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Record facts

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR · Doc. 74 · 2020-05-04 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP  
ETHAN D. DETTMER, SBN 196046  
edettmer@gibsondunn.com 
ABIGAIL A. BARRERA, SBN 301746 
abarrera@gibsondunn.com 
ASHLEY J. HODGE, SBN 287653 
ahodge@gibsondunn.com 
ANTHONY D. BEDEL, SBN 324065 
tbedel@gibsondunn.com 
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 
San Francisco, CA 94105 
Telephone: 415.393.8200 
Facsimile: 415.393.8306 
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 
ALEXANDER H. SOUTHWELL (pro hac vice) 
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com 
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor 
New York, NY 10166 
Telephone: 212.351.4000 
Facsimile: 212.351.4035 
Attorneys for Defendant PLAID INC. 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
IN RE PLAID INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION 
______________________________________ 
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:  
ALL ACTIONS 
Master Docket No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 
ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS 
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-12 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
 
 
Action Filed: 
May 4, 2020 
Trial Date: 
None Set 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
1 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 – MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Defendant Plaid Inc. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs Caroline 
Anderson, James Cottle, Rachel Curtis, David Evans, Logan Mitchell, Alexis Mullen, Jordan Sacks, 
Frederick Schoeneman, Gabriel Sotelo, Jeffrey Umali, Nicholas Yeomelakis, on behalf of themselves 
and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, respectfully 
submit this stipulation to seek extensions on the page limits applicable to the briefings on 
Defendant’s anticipated motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint. 
WHEREAS, certain Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a Complaint on May 4, 2020, 
see Dkt. No. 1; 
WHEREAS, certain Plaintiffs subsequently filed four additional lawsuits against Plaid, 
consisting of related allegations and claims; 
WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ stipulation to consolidate the five lawsuits (ECF 
No. 57); 
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”), asserting ten (10) 
claims for relief on behalf of alleged nationwide and California classes (ECF No. 61); 
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) sets a 25-page limit for a memorandum in support of a 
motion to dismiss; 
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) sets a 25-page limit for a memorandum in support of an 
opposition to a motion to dismiss; 
WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 7-3(c) sets a 15-page limit for a memorandum in support of a 
reply to an opposition to a motion to dismiss;  
WHEREAS, no previous page limit modifications have been made in the case, whether by 
stipulation or Court order; 
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred about the subject matter of the stipulation; 
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the page limitations provided for in the Civil Local Rules 
are inadequate to fully address the factual allegations and causes of action set forth in the CAC, and 
that the Court will benefit from more thorough briefing by the Parties; and 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 2 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
2 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the 
undersigned counsel for the parties in this action, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 that: 
 Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to 
dismiss shall be limited to 40 pages; 
 Plaintiffs’ memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s 
motion to dismiss shall be limited to 45 pages; and 
 Defendant’s reply brief shall be limited to 20 pages, except in the case that 
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to 
dismiss is less than 40 pages, Defendant shall be permitted to extend its reply brief 
by the difference between the length of its memorandum of points and authorities 
in support of its motion to dismiss and 40 pages, but in no event will the reply 
brief exceed 25 pages. 
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the 
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, below. 
 
 
Dated:  September 8, 2020 
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 
By:                   /s/ Ethan D. Dettmer               
 
Ethan D. Dettmer (SBN 196046) 
Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746) 
Ashley J. Hodge (SBN 287653) 
Anthony D. Bedel (SBN 324065) 
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 
Telephone: 415.393.8200 
Fax: 415.393.8306 
abarrera@gibsondunn.com 
ahodge@gibsondunn.com 
tbedel@gibsondunn.com 
 
Alexander H. Southwell (pro hac vice) 
200 Park Avenue, 48th Floor 
New York, NY 10166 
Telephone: 212.351.4000 
Fax: 212.351.4035 
asouthwell@gibsondunn.com 
 
Attorneys for Defendant Plaid Inc. 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 3 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
3 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
Dated: September 8, 2020 
 
 
By:  
               /s/ Shawn M. Kennedy 
 
 
Shawn M. Kennedy (SBN 218472) 
Andrew M. Purdy (SBN 261912) 
Bret D. Hembd (SBN 272826) 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
4590 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 500 
Newport Beach, CA 92660 
Telephone: (949) 936-0900 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
skennedy@herrerapurdy.com 
apurdy@herrerapurdy.com 
bhembd@herrerapurdy.com 
 
Nicomedes Sy Herrera (SBN 275332) 
Laura E. Seidl (SBN 269891) 
HERRERA PURDY LLP 
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 
Oakland, CA 94612 
Telephone: (510) 422-4700 
Fax: (855) 969-2050 
nherrera@herrerapurdy.com 
lseidl@herrerapurdy.com 
 
 
Rachel Geman (pro hac vice) 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 
New York, NY 10013-1413 
Telephone: (212) 355-9500 
Fax: (212) 355-9592 
rgeman@lchb.com 
 
Michael W. Sobol (SBN 194857) 
Melissa Gardner (SBN 289096) 
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 
BERNSTEIN, LLP 
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 
Telephone: (415) 956-1000 
Fax: (415) 956-1008 
msobol@lchb.commgardner@lchb.com 
 
Warren T. Burns (pro hac vice) 
Russell Herman (pro hac vice) 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
900 Jackson Street, Suite 500 
Dallas, TX 75202 
Telephone: (469) 904-4550 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
wburns@burnscharest.com 
rherman@burnscharest.com 
 
Christopher J. Cormier (pro hac vice) 
BURNS CHAREST LLP 
5290 Denver Tech Center Parkway, Suite 150 
Greenwood Village, CO 80111 
Telephone: (720) 630-2092 
Fax: (469) 444-5002 
ccormier@burnscharest.com  
 
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 4 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
4 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
Having reviewed the above Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order To Extend Page Limits 
Pursuant To Civil Local Rule 7-12, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that: 
 Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to 
dismiss shall be limited to 40 pages; 
 Plaintiffs’ memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendant’s 
motion to dismiss shall be limited to 45 pages; and 
 Defendant’s reply brief shall be limited to 20 pages, except in the case that 
Defendant’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion to 
dismiss is less than 40 pages, Defendant shall be permitted to extend its reply brief 
by the difference between the length of its memorandum of points and authorities 
in support of its motion to dismiss and 40 pages, but in no event will the reply 
brief exceed 25 pages. 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
DATED:  ____________, 2020 
_______________________________________ 
THE HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 5 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
5 
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL 
RULE 7-12 - MASTER DOCKET NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
Gibson, Dunn & 
Crutcher LLP 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I, Ethan D. Dettmer, hereby certify that on September 8, 2020, I caused the foregoing Joint 
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Page Limits Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 to be 
electronically filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system.  Notice of this filing will be served to all counsel 
of record by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 
 
              
/s/ Ethan D. Dettmer  
  
Ethan D. Dettmer                    
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 74     Filed 09/08/20     Page 6 of 6

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.74.0.pdf

Size

171,852 bytes

SHA-256

6b43a19f916549457c522600c63b7664a0a2efb3ccc4003b94008f55c2eb2174

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.74.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)