Proposed Order — In re Plaid Inc. Privacy Litigation (Dkt. 54-2, N.D. Cal. No. 4:20-cv-03056)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Continue Case Management Conference, Document 54-2, filed 07/27/20 in James Cottle and Frederick Schoeneman v. Plaid Inc., Case No. 4:20-cv-03056-DMR (N.D. Cal., Oakland Division). In this version the Initial Case Management Conference set for August 5, 2020 would be continued and re-set for the first available date no less than 21 days after Plaintiffs file their proposed Consolidated Complaint. The July 29, 2020 deadline for the Rule 26(f) Report, initial disclosures and Case Management Statement would be vacated and continued to seven days before the conference. The two-page form ends with a blank signature line for Hon. Donna M. Ryu, Federal Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
OAKLAND DIVISION 
 
JAMES COTTLE and FREDERICK 
SCHOENEMAN, on behalf of themselves and 
all others similarly situated, 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
 
 
v. 
 
PLAID INC., a Delaware corporation, 
 
 
 
Defendant. 
Case No.: 4:20-cv-03056-DMR
 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE 
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 54-2     Filed 07/27/20     Page 1 of 2

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
 
 
  
- 1 - 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC 
CASE NO. 4:20-CV-03056-DMR 
 
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Continue the Case Management 
Conference.  The Court has considered the papers and, good cause appearing, GRANTS the 
motion.  It is hereby ORDERED that: 
1. 
The Initial Case Management Conference set for August 5, 2020 is hereby 
continued, and shall be re-set for the first available date no less than 21 days after Plaintiffs file 
their proposed Consolidated Complaint, or a Consolidated Complaint consistent with any further 
order of the Court. 
2. 
The parties’ deadline to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state 
objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per Standing Order re 
Contents of Joint Case Management Statement, currently set for July 29, 2020, is hereby vacated 
and shall be continued to seven days before the Initial Case Management Conference. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
___________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hon. Donna M. Ryu 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal Magistrate Judge  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 4:20-cv-03056-DMR     Document 54-2     Filed 07/27/20     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.54.2.pdf

Size

23,256 bytes

SHA-256

dd068f8712afc8839d8e5494a853191bb7c7a505827af3f825671991701ef68d

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.359040.54.2.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)