Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr

Case docket

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr — 70 court filings in the archive, mostly from U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, filed between July 16, 2019 and December 13, 2023. Among them: 11 declarations, 10 orders and 5 motions.

Case facts

CourtU.S. District Court, Northern District of California (20 filings); U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (16 filings)
Filings70 public filings
Filed2019-07-16 – 2023-12-13
Document typesdeclarations (11), orders (10), motions (5), responses or replies (2), transcripts (2), complaint (1)
Original PDFs70 of 70

Case summary

Four organisations — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, Al Otro Lado, Innovation Law Lab and the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles — filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief on July 16, 2019 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 19-cv-04073-JST, against the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security and their departments and agencies. The complaint challenges an interim final rule and final rule denying asylum to most people who crossed the border between ports of entry or who did not first seek and be denied protection in a third country they transited. On April 8, 2021 the Ninth Circuit issued an amended opinion affirming the district court's preliminary injunction against enforcement of the rule in the four border states. The district court stayed the case in June 2022 pending the government's rulemaking review.

Case at a glance

PartiesPlaintiffs: East Bay Sanctuary Covenant; Al Otro Lado; Innovation Law Lab; Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles. Defendants: William Barr, Attorney General, and the Department of Justice; the Executive Office for Immigration Review and its Director; the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and DHS; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and its Acting Director; U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its Acting Commissioner; Immigration and Customs Enforcement and its Acting Director, officials sued in their official capacities
Court and docketU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 19-cv-04073-JST (filings stamped both 4:19-cv-04073-JST and 3:19-cv-04073-JST); Ninth Circuit opinion and mandate filed into the district docket
ProgramNot named in the filings on this page
ClaimsDeclaratory and injunctive relief challenging the joint Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security interim final rule "Asylum Eligibility and Procedural Modifications", on the basis that the Immigration and Nationality Act makes a noncitizen ineligible for asylum only where she "was firmly resettled in another country prior to arriving in the United States"
Disposition or statusPreliminary injunction affirmed by the Ninth Circuit on April 8, 2021, with rehearing en banc denied; mandate issued April 16, 2021. The case was stayed on June 24, 2022 pending the government's review of the rules; on December 13, 2023 the court issued an order to show cause why the stay should not continue
Status checked2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read

What did the Ninth Circuit decide?

It denied rehearing en banc and issued an amended opinion affirming the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction against enforcement, in the four states on the United States-Mexico border, of the joint interim final rule that categorically denies asylum to people arriving at the border with Mexico unless they first applied for and were denied protection elsewhere.

What does the complaint allege?

That Congress provided in the Immigration and Nationality Act that a noncitizen is ineligible for asylum only if firmly resettled in another country before arriving, and that merely transiting through a third country is not a basis to categorically deny asylum.

What is the status?

Stayed. The order of December 13, 2023 records that the stay was granted on June 24, 2022 pending the government's rulemaking review, that the parties last filed a status report on February 23, 2023, and gives the parties time to file a statement of non-opposition or an opposition explaining why the case should not be stayed.

Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.

Filings

70 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.

  1. Complaint — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Complaint · PDF
  2. Expert Declaration of Professors Anker and Hathaway — International Refugee Law — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  3. Declaration of Daniel Sharp — Central American Resource Center — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  4. Declaration of Erika Pinheiro — Al Otro Lado — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  5. Declaration of Lisa Frydman — Kids in Need of Defense — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  6. Declaration of Michael Smith — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  7. Declaration of Stephen W. Manning — Innovation Law Lab — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  8. Memorandum in Support of TROMemorandum or brief · PDF
  9. Defendants' Opposition to TROPDF
  10. Amicus Brief of Former BIA Members, Immigration Law Judges, and Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  11. Amicus Brief — Former BIA Members, Immigration Law Judges, and Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 33-1, N.D. Cal.)PDF
  12. Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief — Former BIA Members, Immigration Judges, Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 33, N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
  13. Reply in Support of TRO — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrResponse or reply · PDF
  14. Hearing Transcript — Preliminary Injunction Motion, July 24, 2019 — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-07-24)Transcript · PDF
  15. Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay InjunctionPDF
  16. Order Denying Stay Pending AppealOrder · PDF
  17. Pro Se Amicus BriefPDF
  18. Pro Se Motion for Leave to File Amicus BriefPDF
  19. Ninth Circuit Order Denying Administrative StayPDF
  20. Ninth Circuit Order — Partial Stay Pending Appeal (No. 19-16487) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-08-16)PDF
  21. Amicus Brief (Non-Profits and Law School Clinics)PDF
  22. Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide Scope of Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
  23. Memo in Support of Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  24. Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae BriefMotion · PDF
  25. Supplemental Declaration of Stephen W. ManningPDF
  26. Court-Ordered Supplemental Brief on Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  27. ICE OPLA Updated Guidance on Transit Asylum Ban IFR (Dkt. 65-3) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  28. Errata — Opposition to Renewed Motion for Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  29. Administrative Motion to File Guidance Documents Under Seal — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  30. Reply ISO Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide ReliefResponse or reply · PDF
  31. Order Granting Motion to File Portions of Guidance Documents Under Seal — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-05)Order · PDF
  32. Hearing Transcript — Motion to Restore Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-06)Transcript · PDF
  33. Order Granting Motion to Restore Nationwide Scope of Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-09)Order · PDF
  34. Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  35. Defendants' Motion for StayPDF
  36. Joint Statement Concerning Defendants' Emergency Stay Motion — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  37. Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings (Dkt. 87)PDF
  38. Order Granting Motion to Stay District Court ProceedingsOrder · PDF
  39. Ninth Circuit Opinion — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, 964 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2020) (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  40. Declaration of Bridget Cambria — Aldea People's Justice Center — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  41. Declaration of Shalyn Fluharty — Proyecto Dilley — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  42. Declaration of Caroline Heller in Support of Proposed Intervenors' Motion — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
  43. Proposed Intervenors' Motion for Administrative StayPDF
  44. Proposed Intervenors' Motion for Leave to Intervene and…PDF
  45. Order Granting TRO for Proposed IntervenorsOrder · PDF
  46. Administrative Record (Dkt. 110-2)PDF
  47. Declaration of Jay Visconti (CBP STAT)Declaration · PDF
  48. Declaration of Jay ViscontiDeclaration · PDF
  49. Government Opposition to Motions to Intervene and for TRO/PI (Dkt. 110) — East Bay Sanctuary v. BarrPDF
  50. Proposed Intervenors' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for…PDF
  51. Order Extending Temporary Restraining OrderOrder · PDF
  52. Letter re Motion to Intervene BriefingLetter · PDF
  53. Defendants' Response to Request for ClarificationPDF
  54. Order Regarding Motion Briefing — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
  55. Defendants' Response to Intervenors' Notice of Supplemental Authority — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 122, N.D. Cal.)PDF
  56. Order Denying Leave to Intervene and Denying Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 123) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
  57. Ninth Circuit Order — Emergency Administrative Stay Denied (No. 20-17204) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2020-11-21)PDF
  58. Motion for Leave to File Amended ComplaintMotion · PDF
  59. Defendants' Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Wilkinson (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  60. Order Granting Preliminary Injunction Against Final Transit Ban…Order · PDF
  61. Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
  62. Ninth Circuit Amended Opinion — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  63. Ninth Circuit Mandate — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr / Garland (N.D. Cal.)PDF
  64. Ninth Circuit Order Dismissing Intervenors' AppealPDF
  65. Joint Case Management StatementPDF
  66. Joint Case Management StatementPDF
  67. Joint Status Report — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr and v. Trump (September 2022) (N.D. Cal., 2022-09-22)PDF
  68. Joint Status Report — Agency Review of Transit Asylum Rules (Dkt. 158) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2022-12-21)PDF
  69. Status ReportPDF
  70. Order to Show Cause Regarding StayOrder · PDF

More documents from this docket

6 more documents from the same CourtListener docket (gov.uscourts.cand.344869) are in the archive but are not among the 70 filings above.

  1. Complaint (2019-07-17)Order
  2. 1. The government’s deadline to file a motion to dismiss or otherwise answer theStipulation
  3. Complaint (2021-01-19)Exhibit
  4. Complaint (2021-01-19)Exhibit
  5. Complaint - JOINT STIPULATION East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland, Case No. 4 (2021-03-29), Doc. 142Stipulation
  6. Complaint - JOINT STIPULATION East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland, Case No. 4 (2021-03-29), Doc. 143Stipulation

Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.

Back to top