Case docket
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr — 70 court filings in the archive, mostly from U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, filed between July 16, 2019 and December 13, 2023. Among them: 11 declarations, 10 orders and 5 motions.
Case facts
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (20 filings); U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (16 filings) |
|---|---|
| Filings | 70 public filings |
| Filed | 2019-07-16 – 2023-12-13 |
| Document types | declarations (11), orders (10), motions (5), responses or replies (2), transcripts (2), complaint (1) |
| Original PDFs | 70 of 70 |
Case summary
Four organisations — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, Al Otro Lado, Innovation Law Lab and the Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles — filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief on July 16, 2019 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 19-cv-04073-JST, against the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security and their departments and agencies. The complaint challenges an interim final rule and final rule denying asylum to most people who crossed the border between ports of entry or who did not first seek and be denied protection in a third country they transited. On April 8, 2021 the Ninth Circuit issued an amended opinion affirming the district court's preliminary injunction against enforcement of the rule in the four border states. The district court stayed the case in June 2022 pending the government's rulemaking review.
Case at a glance
| Parties | Plaintiffs: East Bay Sanctuary Covenant; Al Otro Lado; Innovation Law Lab; Central American Resource Center in Los Angeles. Defendants: William Barr, Attorney General, and the Department of Justice; the Executive Office for Immigration Review and its Director; the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and DHS; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and its Acting Director; U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its Acting Commissioner; Immigration and Customs Enforcement and its Acting Director, officials sued in their official capacities |
|---|---|
| Court and docket | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 19-cv-04073-JST (filings stamped both 4:19-cv-04073-JST and 3:19-cv-04073-JST); Ninth Circuit opinion and mandate filed into the district docket |
| Program | Not named in the filings on this page |
| Claims | Declaratory and injunctive relief challenging the joint Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security interim final rule "Asylum Eligibility and Procedural Modifications", on the basis that the Immigration and Nationality Act makes a noncitizen ineligible for asylum only where she "was firmly resettled in another country prior to arriving in the United States" |
| Disposition or status | Preliminary injunction affirmed by the Ninth Circuit on April 8, 2021, with rehearing en banc denied; mandate issued April 16, 2021. The case was stayed on June 24, 2022 pending the government's review of the rules; on December 13, 2023 the court issued an order to show cause why the stay should not continue |
| Status checked | 2026-09-23 · against DOJ press releases through 2026-09-22; court docket not yet read |
What did the Ninth Circuit decide?
It denied rehearing en banc and issued an amended opinion affirming the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction against enforcement, in the four states on the United States-Mexico border, of the joint interim final rule that categorically denies asylum to people arriving at the border with Mexico unless they first applied for and were denied protection elsewhere.
What does the complaint allege?
That Congress provided in the Immigration and Nationality Act that a noncitizen is ineligible for asylum only if firmly resettled in another country before arriving, and that merely transiting through a third country is not a basis to categorically deny asylum.
What is the status?
Stayed. The order of December 13, 2023 records that the stay was granted on June 24, 2022 pending the government's rulemaking review, that the parties last filed a status report on February 23, 2023, and gives the parties time to file a statement of non-opposition or an opposition explaining why the case should not be stayed.
Summary written from the documents on this page; every sentence is sourced.
Filings
70 public filings from this case, in filing-date order.
- Complaint — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Complaint · PDF
- Expert Declaration of Professors Anker and Hathaway — International Refugee Law — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Daniel Sharp — Central American Resource Center — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Erika Pinheiro — Al Otro Lado — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Lisa Frydman — Kids in Need of Defense — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Michael Smith — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Stephen W. Manning — Innovation Law Lab — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Memorandum in Support of TROMemorandum or brief · PDF
- Defendants' Opposition to TROPDF
- Amicus Brief of Former BIA Members, Immigration Law Judges, and Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Amicus Brief — Former BIA Members, Immigration Law Judges, and Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 33-1, N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief — Former BIA Members, Immigration Judges, Law Professors — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 33, N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
- Reply in Support of TRO — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrResponse or reply · PDF
- Hearing Transcript — Preliminary Injunction Motion, July 24, 2019 — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-07-24)Transcript · PDF
- Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay InjunctionPDF
- Order Denying Stay Pending AppealOrder · PDF
- Pro Se Amicus BriefPDF
- Pro Se Motion for Leave to File Amicus BriefPDF
- Ninth Circuit Order Denying Administrative StayPDF
- Ninth Circuit Order — Partial Stay Pending Appeal (No. 19-16487) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-08-16)PDF
- Amicus Brief (Non-Profits and Law School Clinics)PDF
- Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide Scope of Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
- Memo in Support of Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae BriefMotion · PDF
- Supplemental Declaration of Stephen W. ManningPDF
- Court-Ordered Supplemental Brief on Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- ICE OPLA Updated Guidance on Transit Asylum Ban IFR (Dkt. 65-3) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Errata — Opposition to Renewed Motion for Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Administrative Motion to File Guidance Documents Under Seal — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Reply ISO Emergency Motion to Restore Nationwide ReliefResponse or reply · PDF
- Order Granting Motion to File Portions of Guidance Documents Under Seal — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-05)Order · PDF
- Hearing Transcript — Motion to Restore Nationwide Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-06)Transcript · PDF
- Order Granting Motion to Restore Nationwide Scope of Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2019-09-09)Order · PDF
- Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction Pending Appeal — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Defendants' Motion for StayPDF
- Joint Statement Concerning Defendants' Emergency Stay Motion — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings (Dkt. 87)PDF
- Order Granting Motion to Stay District Court ProceedingsOrder · PDF
- Ninth Circuit Opinion — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr, 964 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2020) (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Declaration of Bridget Cambria — Aldea People's Justice Center — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Shalyn Fluharty — Proyecto Dilley — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Caroline Heller in Support of Proposed Intervenors' Motion — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Declaration · PDF
- Proposed Intervenors' Motion for Administrative StayPDF
- Proposed Intervenors' Motion for Leave to Intervene and…PDF
- Order Granting TRO for Proposed IntervenorsOrder · PDF
- Administrative Record (Dkt. 110-2)PDF
- Declaration of Jay Visconti (CBP STAT)Declaration · PDF
- Declaration of Jay ViscontiDeclaration · PDF
- Government Opposition to Motions to Intervene and for TRO/PI (Dkt. 110) — East Bay Sanctuary v. BarrPDF
- Proposed Intervenors' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for…PDF
- Order Extending Temporary Restraining OrderOrder · PDF
- Letter re Motion to Intervene BriefingLetter · PDF
- Defendants' Response to Request for ClarificationPDF
- Order Regarding Motion Briefing — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
- Defendants' Response to Intervenors' Notice of Supplemental Authority — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (Dkt. 122, N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Order Denying Leave to Intervene and Denying Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 123) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Order · PDF
- Ninth Circuit Order — Emergency Administrative Stay Denied (No. 20-17204) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2020-11-21)PDF
- Motion for Leave to File Amended ComplaintMotion · PDF
- Defendants' Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction — East Bay Sanctuary v. Wilkinson (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Order Granting Preliminary Injunction Against Final Transit Ban…Order · PDF
- Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)Motion · PDF
- Ninth Circuit Amended Opinion — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Ninth Circuit Mandate — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr / Garland (N.D. Cal.)PDF
- Ninth Circuit Order Dismissing Intervenors' AppealPDF
- Joint Case Management StatementPDF
- Joint Case Management StatementPDF
- Joint Status Report — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr and v. Trump (September 2022) (N.D. Cal., 2022-09-22)PDF
- Joint Status Report — Agency Review of Transit Asylum Rules (Dkt. 158) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2022-12-21)PDF
- Status ReportPDF
- Order to Show Cause Regarding StayOrder · PDF
More documents from this docket
6 more documents from the same CourtListener docket (gov.uscourts.cand.344869) are in the archive but are not among the 70 filings above.
- Complaint (2019-07-17)Order
- 1. The government’s deadline to file a motion to dismiss or otherwise answer theStipulation
- Complaint (2021-01-19)Exhibit
- Complaint (2021-01-19)Exhibit
- Complaint - JOINT STIPULATION East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland, Case No. 4 (2021-03-29), Doc. 142Stipulation
- Complaint - JOINT STIPULATION East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Garland, Case No. 4 (2021-03-29), Doc. 143Stipulation
Court, dates and docket numbers are as recorded on the filings.