Court filing

Ninth Circuit Order — Emergency Administrative Stay Denied (No. 20-17204) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2020-11-21)

Summary

The Ninth Circuit, before Circuit Judges Clifton, Ikuta and Lee, denied the emergency motion of movant-appellants J. S. M., et al. for an administrative stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 13) in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. William P. Barr, et al., No. 20-17204, an appeal from D.C. No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST in the Northern District of California. The order of NOV 21 2020, filed by Clerk Molly C. Dwyer, treats the appellants' petition for rehearing en banc (Docket Entry No. 12) as a motion for reconsideration en banc and denies it on behalf of the court; it appears as Document 127 in the district docket.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed November 21, 2020 in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr; one of 87 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed	2020-11-21

Cite this document

“Ninth Circuit Order — Emergency Administrative Stay Denied (No. 20-17204) — East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Barr (N.D. Cal., 2020-11-21).” U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST, Doc. 127, filed 2020-11-21. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/east-bay-sanctuary-v-barr/2020-11-21-ninth-circuit-order-emergency-denied-dkt-127/, SHA-256 d0a9b3e5294099b737920892a87ed48e45f539437b3a95799f83b878a1a7ae1e.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
 
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
 
EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; 
et al.,  
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs,  
 
  v.  
 
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et 
al.,  
 
 
 
 
 
Defendants-Appellees,  
 
  v.  
 
J. S. M., et al,  
 
 
 
 
 
Movant-Appellant. 
No. 
20-17204  
 
D.C. No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST  
Northern District of California,  
Oakland  
 
ORDER 
 
Before:  CLIFTON, IKUTA, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 
 
Appellants’ emergency motion for an administrative stay of removal 
(Docket Entry No. 13) is denied.   
Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc (Docket Entry No. 12) is treated 
as a motion for reconsideration en banc.  The motion for reconsideration en banc is 
denied on behalf of the court.  See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.11; see also 9th Cir. R. 27-
10.   
FILED 
 
NOV 21 2020 
 
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
Case: 20-17204, 11/21/2020, ID: 11902179, DktEntry: 14, Page 1 of 1
Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST   Document 127   Filed 11/21/20   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.344869.127.0.pdf
Size: 138,984 bytes
SHA-256: d0a9b3e5294099b737920892a87ed48e45f539437b3a95799f83b878a1a7ae1e
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.344869.127.0.pdf
Original: archive.org