Ninth Circuit Order Denying Administrative Stay — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr

Summary

The Ninth Circuit denied the appellants' request for an immediate administrative stay in East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al. v. William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al., No. 19-16487 (D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04073-JST), by an order filed August 2, 2019 before Circuit Judges Tashima, M. Smith and Bennett. The order sets the opposition to the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal for Monday, August 5, 2019 and the optional reply for Tuesday, August 6, 2019.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

SLL/MOATT  
  
  
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 
 
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
 
EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; 
et al.,  
  
 
 
 
 
 
Plaintiffs-Appellees,  
  
   v.  
  
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General; et 
al.,  
  
 
 
 
 
 
Defendants-Appellants. 
No. 
19-16487  
 
D.C. No. 3:19-cv-04073-JST  
Northern District of California,  
San Francisco  
 
ORDER 
 
Before:  TASHIMA, M. SMITH, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.   
 
The court has received appellants’ “Emergency Motion Under Circuit Rule 
27-3 For Administrative Stay and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.”  The request 
for an immediate administrative stay is denied.  
The opposition to the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal is due by 
Monday, August 5, 2019.  The optional reply in support of the emergency motion 
is due on Tuesday, August 6, 2019. 
 
FILED 
 
AUG 2 2019 
 
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK 
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 
Case 3:19-cv-04073-JST   Document 54   Filed 08/05/19   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.344869.54.0.pdf

Size

73,274 bytes

SHA-256

be9e11fe21c8f395e4a660122131200a2f23ffc9f21e5d5519195ca0ff217574

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.344869.54.0.pdf

Original

archive.org