Court filing
Pro Se Amicus Brief — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr (N.D. Cal.)
Filed August 2, 2019 in East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr; one of 69 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2019-08-02 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST · Doc. 53-1 · 2019-08-02 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Duane Morley Cox .. 1199 Cliffside Dr. ^2 20J9 Logan, Utah 84321 susan y. <5^n^, 80'-"5-3578 '-ALlFOFil^l^ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et. al. ^^CEIVED + Case No. Plaintiffs + + Amicus BriefArguing William Barr, Attorney General, in his + For Official Capacity, et. al. + Dismissal For Lack Of Jurisdiction + Defendants + ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ NOW COMES, Duane Morley Cox, Pro Se, and files this Amicus Brief in support of Defendants which briefargues that this Court must Dismiss For Lack OfJurisdiction pursuant to Nixon V. Fitzgerald. Summary 1. During the Nixon administration, an act by the Administration allegedly harmed a man named Fitzgerald, who filed suit against Nixon. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that there would be times when an act of the Administrative Branch or the President himself which was designed to operate for the good ofthe Country would intrude upon the rights of individuals, and held that before a Court could take jurisdiction of such a case, it must be determined ifthe harm to the individual was greater than the good to the country, and if not, then the Court would have no Jurisdiction to hear the complaint of the injured party. 2. The U.S. Supreme Court held: "Held ... 2.(b) The President's absolute immunity is a functionally mandated incident of Pgl Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 2 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 3 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 4 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 5 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 6 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 7 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 8 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 9 of 10 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 53-1 Filed 08/02/19 Page 10 of 10
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.344869.53.1.pdf
- Size
- 1,933,280 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8c78823e708ceb241347b91bb26ab801a71483b7c79fc8456808f75d4c9866a6
- Original
- archive.org