Court filing
EOIR Internal Guidance Email — Ninth Circuit Stay Order (Dkt. 65-1) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr
Summary
An email with the subject "RE: Ninth Circuit Stay Order - Asylum Transit Interim Final Rule Litigation," dated Tuesday, August 20, 2019 9:17:00 AM, filed as Document 65-1 on 08/29/19 in No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It is addressed to a list of recipients that includes McHenry, James (EOIR). The email states that the rule should not be applied to any asylum determination in which the alien was apprehended in the Ninth Circuit, the alien is detained in the Ninth Circuit, or the interview or adjudication itself occurs in the Ninth Circuit. It asks OCIJ to ensure that the guidance is distributed ASAP that day. A footer marks it attorney/client privilege, attorney work product and internal government use only, and a further header line is dated Friday, August 16, 2019 3:43 PM.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2019-08-29 |
Cite this document
“EOIR Internal Guidance Email — Ninth Circuit Stay Order (Dkt. 65-1) — East Bay Sanctuary v. Barr.”
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 4:19-cv-04073-JST, Doc. 65-1, filed 2019-08-29. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/east-bay-sanctuary-v-barr/2019-08-29-eoir-internal-guidance-email-dkt-65-1/
, SHA-256 5974c51e2d65c12413e19983442a9b1d30428a6ff83b8b97b248d91101f579a2.Full text
From: To: McHenry, James (EOIR); Owen, Sirce E. (EOIR); Gupta, Dimple (EOIR); Alder Reid, Lauren (EOIR); Neal, David L. (EOIR); Adkins-Blanch, Chuck (EOIR); Santoro, Christopher A (EOIR); Maggard, Print (EOIR); Cheng, Mary (EOIR) Cc: Subject: RE: Ninth Circuit Stay Order - Asylum Transit Interim Final Rule Litigation Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 9:17:00 AM Good morning, The rule should not be applied to any asylum determination in which: (1) the alien was apprehended in the Ninth Circuit, (2) the alien is detained in the Ninth Circuit, or (3) the interview or adjudication itself occurs in the Ninth Circuit. OCIJ – please ensure that this guidance is distributed ASAP today. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best regards, ***Warning***Attorney/Client Privilege***Attorney Work Product*** This communication and any attachments may contain confidential and/or sensitive attorney/client privileged information or attorney work product and/or law enforcement sensitive information. It is not for release, review, retransmission, dissemination, or use by anyone other than the intended recipient. Please notify the sender if this e-mail has been misdirected and immediately destroy all originals and copies. Furthermore, do not print, copy, re-transmit, disseminate, or otherwise use this information. This document is for INTERNAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY and may be exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(5), (b)(7). From: Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 3:43 PM To: McHenry, James (EOIR) ; Owen, Sirce E. (EOIR) ; Gupta, Dimple (EOIR) ; Alder Reid, Lauren (EOIR) ; Neal, David L. (EOIR) Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 65-1 Filed 08/29/19 Page 1 of 2 Case 4:19-cv-04073-JST Document 65-1 Filed 08/29/19 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.344869.65.1.pdf
- Size
- 171,074 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5974c51e2d65c12413e19983442a9b1d30428a6ff83b8b97b248d91101f579a2
- Original
- archive.org