Full text
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 24-365
(Filed: March 25, 2024)
AIRBOSS DEFENSE GROUP, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
NEW YORK EMBROIDERY
STUDIO, INC.
Defendant-Intervenor.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Pending before the court is the parties’ joint status report and motion to amend the
scheduling order issued by this court on March 22, 2024. ECF No. 23. Plaintiff and defendant
jointly propose an amended schedule, and represent that counsel for defendant-intervenor was
apprised of the proposed schedule and “voiced no objection.” Id. at 5-6 n.5.
For good cause shown, the parties’ motion to amend the scheduling order governing the
proceedings in this case is GRANTED. Therefore, the court now adopts the following schedule
of proceedings:
Event
Date1
Amended complaint
Administrative record
Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record
March 25, 2024
April 3, 2024
April 24, 2024
1 Two of the proposed deadlines – for filing of the amended complaint and of plaintiff’s
response and reply in support of its motion for judgment – fell on non-court days. As such, the
court has understood these proposed deadlines by reference to their closest court day and set
those deadlines accordingly.
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH Document 25 Filed 03/25/24 Page 1 of 2
2
Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s cross-motion(s) for
judgment on the administrative record, motion(s) to dismiss,
and/or response(s) to plaintiff’s motion for judgment
Plaintiff’s response and reply in support of its motion for judgment
Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s reply in support of their
cross-motion(s)
Oral argument
May 15, 2024
May 28, 2024
June 7, 2024
TBD
It is so ORDERED.
s/ Charles F. Lettow
Charles F. Lettow
Senior Judge
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH Document 25 Filed 03/25/24 Page 2 of 2