Order on Motion to Amend Scheduling Order — Airboss Defense Group, LLC v. United States (No. 24-365)

Summary

Order in AIRBOSS DEFENSE GROUP, LLC v. UNITED STATES, with NEW YORK EMBROIDERY STUDIO, INC. as Defendant-Intervenor, No. 24-365, U.S. Court of Federal Claims (filed March 25, 2024). Pending before the court was the parties' joint status report and motion to amend the scheduling order issued on March 22, 2024. The court finds good cause, grants the motion, and adopts a schedule of proceedings listing the amended complaint, the administrative record, motions for judgment, cross-motions, replies, and oral argument, which is listed as TBD. A footnote says two proposed deadlines fell on non-court days and were set by reference to the closest court day. The order is marked s/ Charles F. Lettow, Senior Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 24-365

 (Filed: March 25, 2024)

AIRBOSS DEFENSE GROUP, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

NEW YORK EMBROIDERY
STUDIO, INC.

Defendant-Intervenor.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

ORDER

Pending before the court is the parties’ joint status report and motion to amend the
scheduling order issued by this court on March 22, 2024.  ECF No. 23.  Plaintiff and defendant
jointly propose an amended schedule, and represent that counsel for defendant-intervenor was
apprised of the proposed schedule and “voiced no objection.”  Id. at 5-6 n.5.

For good cause shown, the parties’ motion to amend the scheduling order governing the
proceedings in this case is GRANTED.  Therefore, the court now adopts the following schedule
of proceedings:

                                    Event

Date1
Amended complaint

Administrative record

Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record

March 25, 2024

April 3, 2024

April 24, 2024

1 Two of the proposed deadlines – for filing of the amended complaint and of plaintiff’s
response and reply in support of its motion for judgment – fell on non-court days.  As such, the
court has understood these proposed deadlines by reference to their closest court day and set
those deadlines accordingly.
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH     Document 25     Filed 03/25/24     Page 1 of 2

2

Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s cross-motion(s) for
judgment on the administrative record, motion(s) to dismiss,
and/or response(s) to plaintiff’s motion for judgment

Plaintiff’s response and reply in support of its motion for judgment

Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s reply in support of their
cross-motion(s)

Oral argument
May 15, 2024

May 28, 2024

June 7, 2024

TBD

It is so ORDERED.

s/ Charles F. Lettow

Charles F. Lettow

Senior Judge

Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH     Document 25     Filed 03/25/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.25.0.pdf

Size

121,053 bytes

SHA-256

7cb4c788d3aa3b03f5752a690525be8e0fd4714c3733d38b04b719db7a4eae2d

Our copy

gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.25.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)