Motion for A Protective Order
Summary
AirBoss Defense Group, LLC (“ADG”), the plaintiff in a bid protest against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 24-cv-00365, files a motion for a protective order. It requests that the Court issue a standard Protective Order consistent with Court of Federal Claims Form 8, Protective Order in Procurement Protest Cases. ADG states that the order is necessary to safeguard the confidentiality of competition-sensitive or otherwise protectable information likely to be disclosed during the litigation, and that ADG is likely to suffer serious competitive harm if the information is not adequately safeguarded. The motion is dated March 7, 2024, with /s/ Daniel P. Graham, and names Llewelyn M. Engel as additional counsel.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2024-03-07
Cite this document
“Motion for A Protective Order.”
Original at ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov, dated 2024-03-07. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2024-03-07-plaintiff-v-united-states/
, SHA-256 59ce44fe88d055fbdd4305102dee78707c36a12a0ce0d4219a07ae44b5251d61.Full text
1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS BID PROTEST AirBoss Defense Group, LLC, Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant. No.: 24-cv-00365 MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Pursuant to Rule 5.2(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, Plaintiff, AirBoss Defense Group, LLC (“ADG”), hereby respectfully requests that the Court issue a standard Protective Order in this matter consistent with U.S. Court of Federal Claims Form 8, Protective Order in Procurement Protest Cases. ADG believes that the issuance of a Protective Order is necessary to safeguard the confidentiality of competition-sensitive or otherwise protectable information likely to be disclosed orally or in writing during the course of this litigation. ADG is likely to suffer serious competitive harm if such information is not adequately safeguarded. *** 2 Dated: March 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Daniel P. Graham Daniel P. Graham Llewelyn M. Engel MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 202-756-8890 Counsel for AirBoss Defense Group, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 7, 2024, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be electronically filed with the clerk using the Court’s CM/ECF system. I further certify that I have served the foregoing document via Electronic Mail on the following: United States Department of Justice Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division, 8th Floor 1100 L Street NW Washington, DC 20530 E-mail: nationalcourts.bidprotest@usdoj.gov s/ Daniel P. Graham Daniel P. Graham MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 202-756-8890 Counsel for AirBoss Defense Group, LLC
File and source
- File
- entry-7_doc-7_rd-388277772_gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.7.0.pdf
- Size
- 119,841 bytes
- SHA-256
- 59ce44fe88d055fbdd4305102dee78707c36a12a0ce0d4219a07ae44b5251d61
- Original
- PACER (login required)