Order — AirBoss Defense Group, LLC v. United States, No. 24-365 (Filed: March 22, 2024)
Summary
In an order dated March 22, 2024, in the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 24-365, AirBoss Defense Group, LLC v. United States, with New York Embroidery Studio, Inc. as defendant-intervenor, the court refers to a telephonic initial status conference on March 13, 2024. Pursuant to the agreement reached during the conference, the court adopts a schedule. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record is set for April 12, 2024, and the defendant and defendant-intervenor’s cross-motions for April 29, 2024. The order lists May 8, 2024 for the plaintiff’s response and reply, May 17, 2024 for the defendant and defendant-intervenor’s reply and TBD for oral argument, and is signed s/ Charles F. Lettow, Senior Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Date
- 2024-03-22
Cite this document
“Order — AirBoss Defense Group, LLC v. United States, No. 24-365 (Filed: March 22, 2024).”
Original at ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov, dated 2024-03-22. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/2024-03-22-plaintiff-v-united-states-02b39862-1/
, SHA-256 02b3986237a7dc2ac9d5ff17e028a371515e401b0dfcf75bb4e5c5c874630ff5.Full text
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 24-365
(Filed: March 22, 2024)
AIRBOSS DEFENSE GROUP, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
NEW YORK EMBROIDERY
STUDIO, INC.
Defendant-Intervenor.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
The court held a telephonic initial status conference on March 13, 2024. ECF No. 20.
Pursuant to the agreement reached during the conference regarding further proceedings in this
case, the court adopts the following schedule:
Event
Date
Administrative record
Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record
March 27, 2024
April 12, 2024
Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s cross-motion(s) for
judgment on the administrative record, motion(s) to dismiss,
and/or response(s) to plaintiff’s motion for judgment
Plaintiff’s response and reply in support of its motion for judgment
Defendant and defendant-intervenor’s reply in support of their
cross-motion(s)
Oral argument
April 29, 2024
May 8, 2024
May 17, 2024
TBD
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH Document 22 Filed 03/22/24 Page 1 of 2
It is so ORDERED.
s/ Charles F. Lettow
Charles F. Lettow
Senior Judge
Case 1:24-cv-00365-PSH Document 22 Filed 03/22/24 Page 2 of 2File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.uscfc.49493.22.0.pdf
- Size
- 101,499 bytes
- SHA-256
- 02b3986237a7dc2ac9d5ff17e028a371515e401b0dfcf75bb4e5c5c874630ff5
- Original
- PACER (login required)